These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2072687)

  • 1. Consistency of electroacoustic characteristics across components of FM systems.
    Thibodeau LM; Saucedo KA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):628-35. PubMed ID: 2072687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
    Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electroacoustic characteristics of personal FM systems.
    Hawkins DB; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 Nov; 47(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 7186576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A proposed electroacoustic test protocol for personal FM receivers coupled to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Musgrave E; Momin S; Sandrock C; Romine D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):941-54. PubMed ID: 24384080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation and assessment of FM systems.
    Lewis DE; Feigin JA; Karasek AE; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):268-80. PubMed ID: 1783229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some effects of FM-system coupling on hearing aid characteristics.
    Hawkins DB; Schum DJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 3990259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Verification of a Proposed Clinical Electroacoustic Test Protocol for Personal Digital Modulation Receivers Coupled to Cochlear Implant Sound Processors.
    Nair EL; Sousa R; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(7):625-635. PubMed ID: 28722645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency Modulation System and Bone Conduction Hearing Aid: Electroacoustic Verification.
    Paccola ECM; Costa Filho OA; Jacob RTS
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 25(4):e483-e489. PubMed ID: 34737817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency response characteristics of FM mini-loop auditory trainers.
    Van Tasell DJ; Landin DP
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1980 May; 45(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 7442158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electroacoustic performance characteristics of FM auditory trainers.
    Freeman BA; Sinclair JS; Riggs DE
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1980 Feb; 45(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 7354626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A note on determination of the diffuse-field sensitivity of microphones using the reciprocity technique.
    Barrera-Figueroa S; Rasmussen K; Jacobsen F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1505-12. PubMed ID: 19045642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complex and pure-tone signals in the evaluation of hearing-aid characteristics.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Seewald RC; Hawkins DB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 2359278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
    van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Status of sound field audiometry among audiologists in the United States.
    Rochlin GD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Mar; 4(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 8471786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidelines for selecting microphones for human voice production research.
    Svec JG; Granqvist S
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Nov; 19(4):356-68. PubMed ID: 20601621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing aid measurements using the revised standard: reducing variability and determining test system accuracy.
    Townsend TH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 23(2):322-35. PubMed ID: 7442193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An acoustical array combining microphones and piezoelectric devices.
    Matsumoto M; Hashimoto S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2117-25. PubMed ID: 18397019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and performance evaluation of a broadband three dimensional acoustic intensity measuring system.
    Miah KH; Hixon EL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2338-46. PubMed ID: 20370016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligibility of telephone speech for the hearing impaired when various microphones are used for acoustic coupling.
    Janota CP; Janota JO
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 34(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 2008072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.