211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20726914)
1. Biomechanical behaviour of a fractured maxillary incisor restored with direct composite resin only or with different post systems.
Garbin CA; Spazzin AO; Meira-Júnior AD; Loretto SC; Lyra AM; Braz R
Int Endod J; 2010 Dec; 43(12):1098-107. PubMed ID: 20726914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: Finite element analysis.
Silva NR; Castro CG; Santos-Filho PC; Silva GR; Campos RE; Soares PV; Soares CJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19553714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: effect of tooth coloured post material and surface conditioning.
Toman M; Toksavul S; Sarikanat M; Nergiz I; Schmage P
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20397499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis.
Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Apicella D; Valentino B; Ferrari M; Aversa R; Apicella A
Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1035-44. PubMed ID: 16406084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of luting agents and reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre-fabricated post systems.
Toksavul S; Toman M; Uyulgan B; Schmage P; Nergiz I
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 32(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 15899022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of post and resin cement on stress distribution of maxillary central incisors restored with direct resin composite.
Spazzin AO; Galafassi D; de Meira-Júnior AD; Braz R; Garbin CA
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 19363979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts.
Naumann M; Preuss A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 16464492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance and deflection of pulpless anterior teeth restored with composite or porcelain veneers.
D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; Vadini M; D'Amario M; Caputi S
J Endod; 2010 Jan; 36(1):153-6. PubMed ID: 20003956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of post, core, crown type, and ferrule presence on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated bovine anterior teeth.
da Silva NR; Raposo LH; Versluis A; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):306-17. PubMed ID: 20970537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study.
Butz F; Lennon AM; Heydecke G; Strub JR
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11842907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture strength in restored teeth before and after load cycling: an in vitro study.
Aghdaee NA; Darban JG; Mohajeri A
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2011 May; 39(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 21721474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.
Zhi-Yue L; Yu-Xing Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 12690349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restoration of two fractured, endodontically treated teeth using nonmetallic materials.
Crisler JF
Dent Today; 2000 Oct; 19(10):62-5. PubMed ID: 12524807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reattachment of a fractured maxillary incisor crown--case report.
John R; Prabhu NT; Munshi AK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Mar; 16(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 11813713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of reattached incisal fragments using different materials and techniques.
Chazine M; Sedda M; Ounsi HF; Paragliola R; Ferrari M; Grandini S
Dent Traumatol; 2011 Feb; 27(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 21244624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of post materials and length on the stress distribution of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors: a 3D finite element analysis.
Hsu ML; Chen CS; Chen BJ; Huang HH; Chang CL
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 36(11):821-30. PubMed ID: 19840225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive solutions for pediatric and adult patients.
LeBlanc BJ
Dent Today; 2010 Jul; 29(7):112-5. PubMed ID: 20687436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
