These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20728045)

  • 1. A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases.
    Shamliyan T; Kane RL; Dickinson S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1061-70. PubMed ID: 20728045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases.
    Shamliyan T; Kane RL; Jansen S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 65(6):610-8. PubMed ID: 22424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development quality criteria to evaluate nontherapeutic studies of incidence, prevalence, or risk factors of chronic diseases: pilot study of new checklists.
    Shamliyan TA; Kane RL; Ansari MT; Raman G; Berkman ND; Grant M; Janes G; Maglione M; Moher D; Nasser M; Robinson KA; Segal JB; Tsouros S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 64(6):637-57. PubMed ID: 21071174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epidemiology of bruxism in adults: a systematic review of the literature.
    Manfredini D; Winocur E; Guarda-Nardini L; Paesani D; Lobbezoo F
    J Orofac Pain; 2013; 27(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 23630682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NUQUEST-NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies.
    Kelly SE; Greene-Finestone LS; Yetley EA; Benkhedda K; Brooks SPJ; Wells GA; MacFarlane AJ
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2022 Jan; 115(1):256-271. PubMed ID: 34605544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.
    Katrak P; Bialocerkowski AE; Massy-Westropp N; Kumar S; Grimmer KA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Sep; 4():22. PubMed ID: 15369598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials.
    Yamato TP; Maher C; Koes B; Moseley A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():176-181. PubMed ID: 28288916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) checklist: Application to multiple sclerosis.
    Fiest KM; Marrie RA; Jette N; Bennett DA
    Mult Scler; 2017 Jan; 23(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 26920378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.
    Tate RL; McDonald S; Perdices M; Togher L; Schultz R; Savage S
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 18(4):385-401. PubMed ID: 18576270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography.
    Sanderson S; Tatt ID; Higgins JP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 36(3):666-76. PubMed ID: 17470488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical research of peri-implant diseases--quality of reporting, case definitions and methods to study incidence, prevalence and risk factors of peri-implant diseases.
    Tomasi C; Derks J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 39 Suppl 12():207-23. PubMed ID: 22533958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity.
    Bornhöft G; Maxion-Bergemann S; Wolf U; Kienle GS; Michalsen A; Vollmar HC; Gilbertson S; Matthiessen PF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Dec; 6():56. PubMed ID: 17156475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. USING THE AMSTAR CHECKLIST FOR RAPID REVIEWS: IS IT FEASIBLE?
    Mattivi JT; Buchberger B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 27751191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.
    Burr H; Formazin M; Pohrt A
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2016 May; 42(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 26960179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours.
    Wong WC; Cheung CS; Hart GJ
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 5():23. PubMed ID: 19014686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.