These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20728080)

  • 1. Perception of randomness: On the time of streaks.
    Sun Y; Wang H
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Dec; 61(4):333-42. PubMed ID: 20728080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than four.
    Hahn U; Warren PA
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Apr; 116(2):454-61. PubMed ID: 19348550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relatively random: context effects on perceived randomness and predicted outcomes.
    Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1642-8. PubMed ID: 23356242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events.
    Oskarsson AT; Van Boven L; McClelland GH; Hastie R
    Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85. PubMed ID: 19254080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.
    Pronin E
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Jan; 11(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17129749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occurrence and nonoccurrence of random sequences: comment on Hahn and Warren (2009).
    Sun Y; Tweney RD; Wang H
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Apr; 117(2):697-705; discussion 706-11. PubMed ID: 20438245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regular and random judgements are not two sides of the same coin: Both representativeness and encoding play a role in randomness perception.
    Gronchi G; Sloman SA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1707-1714. PubMed ID: 33959894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The smart potential behind probability matching.
    Gaissmaier W; Schooler LJ
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 19019351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective randomness and natural scene statistics.
    Hsu AS; Griffiths TL; Schreiber E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 21037158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hindsight bias: how knowledge and heuristics affect our reconstruction of the past.
    Hertwig R; Fanselow C; Hoffrage U
    Memory; 2003; 11(4-5):357-77. PubMed ID: 14562868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A re-examination of "bias" in human randomness perception.
    Warren PA; Gostoli U; Farmer GD; El-Deredy W; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):663-680. PubMed ID: 29058943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two mechanisms underlying the effect of angle of motion direction change on colour-motion asynchrony.
    Amano K; Johnston A; Nishida S
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(5):687-705. PubMed ID: 17254624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time in the mind: using space to think about time.
    Casasanto D; Boroditsky L
    Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):579-93. PubMed ID: 17509553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peering into the bias blind spot: people's assessments of bias in themselves and others.
    Ehrlinger J; Gilovich T; Ross L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 May; 31(5):680-92. PubMed ID: 15802662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are random events perceived as rare? On the relationship between perceived randomness and outcome probability.
    Teigen KH; Keren G
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):299-313. PubMed ID: 31900799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions?
    Griffin D; Buehler R
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):48-78. PubMed ID: 10090798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of symptom presentation order on perceived disease risk.
    Kwan VS; Wojcik SP; Miron-Shatz T; Votruba AM; Olivola CY
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Apr; 23(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 22395133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Base rates, contingencies, and prediction behavior.
    Kareev Y; Fiedler K; Avrahami J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 19271852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.