168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20728550)
1. Investigating brain response to music: a comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes.
Mueller K; Mildner T; Fritz T; Lepsien J; Schwarzbauer C; Schroeter ML; Möller HE
Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(1):337-43. PubMed ID: 20728550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Detection of central auditory compensation in unilateral deafness with functional magnetic resonance tomography].
Tschopp K; Schillinger C; Schmid N; Rausch M; Bilecen D; Scheffler K
Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Dec; 79(12):753-7. PubMed ID: 11199459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing BOLD response in the auditory system by neurophysiologically tuned fMRI sequence.
Seifritz E; Di Salle F; Esposito F; Herdener M; Neuhoff JG; Scheffler K
Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(3):1013-22. PubMed ID: 16253522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How restful is it with all that noise? Comparison of Interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) and conventional imaging in resting-state fMRI.
Andoh J; Ferreira M; Leppert IR; Matsushita R; Pike B; Zatorre RJ
Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():726-735. PubMed ID: 27902936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional fields in human auditory cortex revealed by time-resolved fMRI without interference of EPI noise.
Di Salle F; Formisano E; Seifritz E; Linden DE; Scheffler K; Saulino C; Tedeschi G; Zanella FE; Pepino A; Goebel R; Marciano E
Neuroimage; 2001 Feb; 13(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 11162273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Event-related fMRI of the auditory cortex.
Belin P; Zatorre RJ; Hoge R; Evans AC; Pike B
Neuroimage; 1999 Oct; 10(4):417-29. PubMed ID: 10493900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of "silent" clustered and sparse temporal fMRI acquisitions in tonal and speech perception tasks.
Zaehle T; Schmidt CF; Meyer M; Baumann S; Baltes C; Boesiger P; Jancke L
Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1195-204. PubMed ID: 17644001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) imaging: a new sparse imaging method applied to auditory fMRI.
Schwarzbauer C; Davis MH; Rodd JM; Johnsrude I
Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(3):774-82. PubMed ID: 16226896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reducing the interval between volume acquisitions improves "sparse" scanning protocols in event-related auditory fMRI.
Liem F; Lutz K; Luechinger R; Jäncke L; Meyer M
Brain Topogr; 2012 Apr; 25(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 22015572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatio-temporal analysis of auditory cortex activation as detected with silent event related fMRI.
Christensen WF; Yetkin FZ
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(16):2539-56. PubMed ID: 15909287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing the imaging of the monkey auditory cortex: sparse vs. continuous fMRI.
Petkov CI; Kayser C; Augath M; Logothetis NK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Oct; 27(8):1065-73. PubMed ID: 19269764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.
Gaab N; Gabrieli JD; Glover GH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Aug; 28(8):703-20. PubMed ID: 17080440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human auditory cortex.
Binder JR; Rao SM; Hammeke TA; Yetkin FZ; Jesmanowicz A; Bandettini PA; Wong EC; Estkowski LD; Goldstein MD; Haughton VM
Ann Neurol; 1994 Jun; 35(6):662-72. PubMed ID: 8210222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scanning for the scanner: FMRI of audition by read-out omissions from echo-planar imaging.
Bartsch AJ; Homola G; Thesen S; Sahmer P; Keim R; Beckmann CF; Biller A; Knaus C; Bendszus M
Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 17188900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scanning silence: mental imagery of complex sounds.
Bunzeck N; Wuestenberg T; Lutz K; Heinze HJ; Jancke L
Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(4):1119-27. PubMed ID: 15893474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metabolic and electric brain patterns during pleasant and unpleasant emotions induced by music masterpieces.
Flores-Gutiérrez EO; Díaz JL; Barrios FA; Favila-Humara R; Guevara MA; del Río-Portilla Y; Corsi-Cabrera M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jul; 65(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 17466401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous 3-T fMRI and high-density recording of human auditory evoked potentials.
Scarff CJ; Reynolds A; Goodyear BG; Ponton CW; Dort JC; Eggermont JJ
Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):1129-42. PubMed ID: 15528112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects.
Amaro E; Williams SC; Shergill SS; Fu CH; MacSweeney M; Picchioni MM; Brammer MJ; McGuire PK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Nov; 16(5):497-510. PubMed ID: 12412026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neuroanatomic differences in children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss detected using functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Propst EJ; Greinwald JH; Schmithorst V
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 136(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20083773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency specific impairment of automatic pitch change detection by fMRI acoustic noise: an MEG study.
Novitski N; Maess B; Tervaniemi M
J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jul; 155(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 16530843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
