BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20728891)

  • 1. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2908-14. PubMed ID: 20728891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head.
    Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of interfacial conditions and stem length on potential failure mechanisms in the uncemented resurfaced femur.
    Gupta S; Pal B; New AM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 38(6):2107-20. PubMed ID: 20309732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
    Long JP; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation into the affect of cementing techniques on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
    Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):422-30. PubMed ID: 17270328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strain and micromotion in intact and resurfaced composite femurs: experimental and numerical investigations.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM; Browne M
    J Biomech; 2010 Jul; 43(10):1923-30. PubMed ID: 20392448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
    Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of primary stability on load transfer and bone remodelling within the uncemented resurfaced femur.
    Pal B; Gupta S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):549-61. PubMed ID: 22034739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The biomechanical consequence of insufficient femoral component lateralization and exposed cancellous bone in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Olsen M; Davis ET; Whyne CM; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081011. PubMed ID: 20670060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term study of bone remodelling after femoral stem: a comparison between dexa and finite element simulation.
    Herrera A; Panisello JJ; Ibarz E; Cegoñino J; Puértolas JA; Gracia L
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(16):3615-25. PubMed ID: 17675042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
    Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Aug; 22(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 17544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
    Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.