199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20729182)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and conventional multislice spiral tomography in sheep mandibular condyle fractures.
Sirin Y; Guven K; Horasan S; Sencan S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):336-42. PubMed ID: 20729182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of secondary reconstruction slice thickness on NewTom 3G cone beam computed tomography-based radiological interpretation of sheep mandibular condyle fractures.
Sirin Y; Guven K; Horasan S; Sencan S; Bakir B; Barut O; Tanyel C; Aral A; Firat D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):638-47. PubMed ID: 20889356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpretation of mandibular condyle fractures using 2D- and 3D-computed tomography.
Costa e Silva AP; Antunes JL; Cavalcanti MG
Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 15057398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection accuracy of condylar defects in cone beam CT images scanned with different resolutions and units.
Zhang ZL; Shi XQ; Ma XC; Li G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(3):20130414. PubMed ID: 24408818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
Patel A; Tee BC; Fields H; Jones E; Chaudhry J; Sun Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24485728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Condyle Fracture by Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in a Hybrid Operating Room.
Sukegawa S; Masui M; Kanno T; Miki M; Nakamoto H; Furuki Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(3):762-765. PubMed ID: 31856135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography in diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fractures in dried human skull: an in vitro study.
Eskandarlou A; Poorolajal J; Talaeipour AR; Talebi S; Talaeipour M
Dent Traumatol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23826823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with multislice computed tomography in detection of small osseous condylar defects.
Jones EM; Papio M; Tee BC; Beck FM; Fields HW; Sun Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jul; 150(1):130-9. PubMed ID: 27364215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion.
Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Bieza A; Zepa K; Rogovska I
Stomatologija; 2007; 9(3):67-71. PubMed ID: 17993738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography.
Bayram M; Kayipmaz S; Sezgin OS; Küçük M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1812-6. PubMed ID: 21680124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.
Pittayapat P; Galiti D; Huang Y; Dreesen K; Schreurs M; Souza PC; Rubira-Bullen IR; Westphalen FH; Pauwels R; Kalema G; Willems G; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 22382448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone beam CT and conventional tomography for the detection of morphological temporomandibular joint changes.
Hintze H; Wiese M; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):192-7. PubMed ID: 17536085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography in the detection of osteosynthesis complications in sheep mandibular angle fractures.
Sirin Y; Yildirimturk S; Aytugar E; Cakarer S; Horasan S; Guven K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Feb; 127(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 30415905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of vertical root fracture using cone-beam computerized tomography: an in vitro assessment.
Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Yüksel SP; Cebeci AR; Horasan S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e74-81. PubMed ID: 20031454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone beam computed tomography-based models versus multislice spiral computed tomography-based models for assessing condylar morphology.
Gomes LR; Gomes MR; Gonçalves JR; Ruellas AC; Wolford LM; Paniagua B; Benavides E; Cevidanes LH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Jan; 121(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 26679363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam computed tomography imaging of dentoalveolar and mandibular fractures.
Aydin U; Gormez O; Yildirim D
Oral Radiol; 2020 Jul; 36(3):217-224. PubMed ID: 31102106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements.
Markic G; Müller L; Patcas R; Roos M; Lochbühler N; Peltomäki T; Karlo CA; Ullrich O; Kellenberger CJ
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 25154725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of condylar bone remodeling of temporomandibular joint based on cone-beam CT imaging].
Li Y; Liu MQ; Liu B; Lei J; Fu KY
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 32878395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical study of three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography in diagnosis of condylar fractures].
Wu H; Luo J; Zhu Z
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 18(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 12539362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling.
Verhelst PJ; Shaheen E; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Van der Cruyssen F; Shujaat S; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Swennen G; Politis C; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Mar; 49(3):20190364. PubMed ID: 31674794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
