These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20729586)

  • 1. Stormwater quality models: performance and sensitivity analysis.
    Dotto CB; Kleidorfer M; Deletic A; Fletcher TD; McCarthy DT; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(4):837-43. PubMed ID: 20729586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian approach for the calibration of models: application to an urban stormwater pollution model.
    Kanso A; Gromaire MC; Gaume E; Tassin B; Chebbo G
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(4):77-84. PubMed ID: 12666804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stormwater quality modelling in combined sewers: calibration and uncertainty analysis.
    Kanso A; Chebbo G; Tassin B
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(3):63-71. PubMed ID: 16206845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of parameter uncertainty of a flow and quality stormwater model.
    Dotto CB; Deletic A; Fletcher TD
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):717-25. PubMed ID: 19657167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of stormwater quality regression models: a random process?
    Dembélé A; Bertrand-Krajewski JL; Barillon B
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(4):875-82. PubMed ID: 20729591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity analysis of an urban stormwater microorganism model.
    McCarthy DT; Deletic A; Mitchell VG; Diaper C
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1393-400. PubMed ID: 20861555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A benchmark methodology for managing uncertainties in urban runoff quality models.
    Kanso A; Tassin B; Chebbo G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 15790240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.
    Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new empirical model for stormwater TSS event mean concentrations (EMCs).
    Dembélé A; Bertrand-Krajewski JL; Becouze C; Barillon B
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(9):1926-34. PubMed ID: 22020489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian analysis for erosion modelling of sediments in combined sewer systems.
    Kanso A; Chebbo G; Tassin B
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):135-42. PubMed ID: 16248189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stormwater quality models: sensitivity to calibration data.
    Mourad M; Bertrand-Krajewski JL; Chebbo G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):61-8. PubMed ID: 16248181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Urban nonpoint source pollution buildup and washoff models for simulating storm runoff quality in the Los Angeles County.
    Wang L; Wei J; Huang Y; Wang G; Maqsood I
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Jul; 159(7):1932-40. PubMed ID: 21486683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of input data uncertainties on urban stormwater model parameters.
    Kleidorfer M; Deletic A; Fletcher TD; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1545-54. PubMed ID: 19759457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitor-based evaluation of pollutant load from urban stormwater runoff in Beijing.
    Liu Y; Che W; Li J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(9):191-7. PubMed ID: 16445188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using satellite imagery for stormwater pollution management with Bayesian networks.
    Park MH; Stenstrom MK
    Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(18):3429-38. PubMed ID: 16956642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wet weather water quality modelling of a Portuguese urban catchment: difficulties and benefits.
    David LM; Matos RS
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 11902464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of land use/land cover datasets for urban watershed modeling.
    Burian SJ; Brown MJ; McPherson TN
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):269-76. PubMed ID: 12079113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of land use with water quality data in stormwater using a neural network.
    Ha H; Stenstrom MK
    Water Res; 2003 Oct; 37(17):4222-30. PubMed ID: 12946904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of rainfall time resolution for urban water quality modelling.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2381-90. PubMed ID: 20418636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calibrating and validating bacterial water quality models: a Bayesian approach.
    Gronewold AD; Qian SS; Wolpert RL; Reckhow KH
    Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(10):2688-98. PubMed ID: 19395060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.