These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20729778)

  • 1. Intraoperative auditory steady state response measurements during Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implantation in patients with mixed hearing loss: preliminary results.
    Verhaegen VJ; Mulder JJ; Noten JF; Luijten BM; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Dec; 31(9):1365-8. PubMed ID: 20729778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrocochleography in round window Vibrant Soundbridge implantation.
    Colletti V; Mandalà M; Colletti L
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 146(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 22140205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
    Colletti L; Mandalà M; Colletti V
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of the atretic ear with round window vibrant soundbridge implantation in infants and children: electrocochleography and audiologic outcomes.
    Mandalà M; Colletti L; Colletti V
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1250-5. PubMed ID: 21897320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oval window membrane vibroplasty for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation: treating severe mixed hearing loss in challenging middle ears.
    Schwab B; Salcher RB; Maier H; Kontorinis G
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 22699990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vibroplasty for mixed and conductive hearing loss.
    Luers JC; Hüttenbrink KB; Zahnert T; Bornitz M; Beutner D
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1005-12. PubMed ID: 23820796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty.
    Rajan GP; Lampacher P; Ambett R; Dittrich G; Kuthubutheen J; Wood B; McArthur A; Marino R
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Feb; 32(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21206391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The floating mass transducer for external auditory canal and middle ear malformations.
    Colletti L; Carner M; Mandalà M; Veronese S; Colletti V
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 21131892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E; Riss D; Honeder C; Arnoldner C; Hamzavi JS; Baumgartner WD; Flak S; Gstoettner W
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.
    Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Heyd A; Wildenstein D; Hagen R; Gummer AW; Schraven SP
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25099400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vibrant Soundbridge rehabilitation of conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Lüers JC; Hüttenbrink KB
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2014 Dec; 47(6):915-26. PubMed ID: 25282039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
    Verhaegen VJ; Mulder JJ; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
    Lee JM; Jung J; Moon IS; Kim SH; Choi JY
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exclusive transcanal surgical approach for Vibrant Soundbridge implantation: surgical and functional results.
    Bruschini L; Forli F; Giannarelli M; Bruschini P; Berrettini S
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):950-5. PubMed ID: 19730149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.
    Häusler R; Stieger C; Bernhard H; Kompis M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 18259077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses.
    Bernardeschi D; Hoffman C; Benchaa T; Labassi S; Beliaeff M; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the Vibrant Soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery.
    Linder T; Schlegel C; DeMin N; van der Westhuizen S
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18849883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids.
    Gunduz B; Atas A; Bayazıt YA; Goksu N; Gokdogan C; Tutar H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 23039370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.