These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20730687)

  • 1. Comparison of Hybrid III child test dummies to pediatric PMHS in blunt thoracic impact response.
    Parent DP; Crandall JR; Bolton JR; Bass CR; Ouyang J; Lau SH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Aug; 11(4):399-410. PubMed ID: 20730687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rationale for and dimensions of impact surfaces for biofidelity tests of different sizes of frontal and side impact dummies.
    Irwin AL; Mertz HJ
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2010 Nov; 54():19-35. PubMed ID: 21512902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Male and female WorldSID and post mortem human subject responses in full-scale vehicle tests.
    Yoganandan N; Humm J; Pintar F; Rhule H; Moorhouse K; Suntay B; Stricklin J; Rudd R; Craig M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S136-S141. PubMed ID: 28332863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responses of side impact dummies in sled tests.
    Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 May; 37(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 15784203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pediatric head and neck dynamics in frontal impact: analysis of important mechanical factors and proposed neck performance corridors for 6- and 10-year-old ATDs.
    Dibb AT; Cutcliffe HC; Luck JF; Cox CA; Myers BS; Bass CR; Arbogast KB; Seacrist T; Nightingale RW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 24471363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frontal impact dummy kinematics in oblique frontal collisions: evaluation against post mortem human subject test data.
    Törnvall FV; Svensson MY; Davidsson J; Flogård A; Kallieris D; Håland Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Dec; 6(4):340-50. PubMed ID: 16266943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of small female PMHS thoracic responses to scaled response corridors in a frontal hub impact.
    Kang YS; Bendig A; Stammen J; Hutter E; Moorhouse K; Bolte JH; Agnew AM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 36576054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of cervical spine injury risk for the 6-year-old child in frontal crashes.
    Sherwood CP; Shaw CG; Van Rooij L; Kent RW; Crandall JR; Orzechowski KM; Eichelberger MR; Kallieris D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 14522645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A methodology to estimate the kinematics of pediatric occupants in frontal impacts.
    Lopez-Valdes FJ; Seacrist T; Arbogast KB; Balasubramanian S; Maltese MR; Tanji H; Higuchi K; Kent R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 22817555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of biomechanical head-neck responses of hybrid III dummy and whole body cadaver during inverted drops.
    Sances A; Kumaresan S
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():423-7. PubMed ID: 11347428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response corridors for the medial-lateral compressive stiffness of the human arm: Implications for side impact protection.
    Kemper AR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():204-22. PubMed ID: 22579220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a three-year-old child FE model.
    Mizuno K; Iwata K; Deguchi T; Ikami T; Kubota M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Dec; 6(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 16266945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biofidelity assessment of the 6-year-old ATDs in lateral impact.
    Yaek JL; Li Y; Lemanski PJ; Begeman PC; Rouhana SW; Cavanaugh JM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):535-43. PubMed ID: 26507576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normalizing and scaling of data to derive human response corridors from impact tests.
    Yoganandan N; Arun MW; Pintar FA
    J Biomech; 2014 Jun; 47(8):1749-56. PubMed ID: 24726322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The RID2 biofidelic rear impact dummy: a pilot study using human subjects in low speed rear impact full scale crash tests.
    Croft AC; Philippens MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 17094931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response Ratio Development for Lateral Pendulum Impact with Porcine Thorax and Abdomen Surrogate Equivalents.
    Yaek JL; Cavanaugh JM; Rouhana SW
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2019 Nov; 63():177-193. PubMed ID: 32311056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical response targets for physical and computational models of the pediatric trunk.
    Kent R; Lopez-Valdes FJ; Lamp J; Lau S; Parent D; Kerrigan J; Lessley D; Salzar R; Sochor M; Bass D; Maltese MR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012 Sep; 13(5):499-506. PubMed ID: 22931180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical analysis of head-neck force in hybrid III dummy during inverted vertical drops.
    Sances A; Carlin F; Kumaresan S
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():459-64. PubMed ID: 12085650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incorporation of CPR Data into ATD Chest Impact Response Requirements.
    Maltese MR; Arbogast KB; Nadkarni V; Berg R; Balasubramanian S; Seacrist T; Kent RW; Parent DP; Craig M; Ridella SA
    Ann Adv Automot Med; 2010; 54():79-88. PubMed ID: 21050593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of human body model morphing for the assessment of abdomen responses to impact against a population of test subjects.
    Beillas P; Berthet F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S142-S147. PubMed ID: 28323442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.