These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2073122)

  • 1. Fastidious anaerobe agar compared with Wilkins-Chalgren agar, brain heart infusion agar, and brucella agar for susceptibility testing of Fusobacterium species.
    Brazier JS; Goldstein EJ; Citron DM; Ostovari MI
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1990 Nov; 34(11):2280-2. PubMed ID: 2073122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative activity of SCH 34343 against anaerobic bacteria.
    Sutter VL; Wexler H; Finegold SM
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 Apr; 4(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 3698546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multilaboratory comparison of anaerobe susceptibility results using 3 different agar media.
    Roe DE; Finegold SM; Citron DM; Goldstein EJ; Wexler HM; Rosenblatt JE; Cox ME; Jenkins SG; Hecht DW
    Clin Infect Dis; 2002 Sep; 35(Suppl 1):S40-6. PubMed ID: 12173107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting antimicrobial susceptibility of Fusobacterium species.
    Rowland MD; Del Bene VE; Lewis JW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Mar; 25(3):476-9. PubMed ID: 3494743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of two media for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria using the receiver operating characteristic procedure.
    Castel O; Grollier G; Agius G; Toullat G; de Rautlin de la Roy Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1990 Sep; 9(9):667-71. PubMed ID: 2226495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by different methods.
    Rosenblatt JE; Murray PR; Sonnenwirth AC; Joyce JL
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Mar; 15(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 464560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of activities of trovafloxacin (CP-99,219) and five other agents against 585 anaerobes with use of three media.
    Hecht DW; Osmolski JR
    Clin Infect Dis; 1996 Dec; 23 Suppl 1():S44-50. PubMed ID: 8953106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Sweden in 1983.
    Nord CE; Olsson-Liljequist B
    Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1984; 43():44-9. PubMed ID: 6100139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Agar medium for use in susceptibility testing of bacteria from human periodontal pockets.
    Walker CB; Niebloom TA; Socransky SS
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Oct; 16(4):452-7. PubMed ID: 518074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative in vitro activity of 1-oxa-beta-lactam (LY127935) and cefoperazone with other beta-lactam antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria.
    Borobio MV; Aznar J; Jimenez R; Garcia F; Perea EJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Feb; 17(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 6247966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the E test and a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Wüst J; Hardegger U
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Dec; 11(12):1169-73. PubMed ID: 1291316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria determined by agar dilution and by a microbroth method.
    Baron EJ; Bruckner DA
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S249-53. PubMed ID: 6718938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multilaboratory comparison of growth characteristics for anaerobes, using 5 different agar media.
    Roe DE; Finegold SM; Citron DM; Goldstein EJ; Wexler HM; Rosenblatt JE; Cox ME; Jenkins SG; Hecht DW
    Clin Infect Dis; 2002 Sep; 35(Suppl 1):S36-9. PubMed ID: 12173106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of four commercial brucella agar media for growth of anaerobic organisms.
    Mangels JI; Douglas BP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2268-71. PubMed ID: 2584378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a EUCAST disk diffusion method for the susceptibility testing of rapidly growing anaerobic bacteria using Fastidious Anaerobe Agar (FAA): a development study using Bacteroides species.
    Bavelaar H; Justesen US; Morris TE; Anderson B; Copsey-Mawer S; Stubhaug TT; Kahlmeter G; Matuschek E
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1695.e1-1695.e6. PubMed ID: 33813129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Susceptibility testing of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by an agar dilution technique.
    Brown WJ; Waatti PE
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Apr; 17(4):629-35. PubMed ID: 6901592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of inoculum size and medium on activity of seven antimicrobial agents against Bacteroides fragilis strains.
    Wexler HM; Reeves D; Finegold SM
    Clin Ther; 1989; 11(6):828-33. PubMed ID: 2611824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sensitivity of strict anaerobic bacteria to metronidazole, cefoxitin, and clindamycin].
    Dubreuil L; Derriennic M; Reynaud A; Devos J; Romond C; Courtieu A
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 Nov; 33(9):899-903. PubMed ID: 3909082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of the sensitivity to antibiotics of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium using the ATB ANA system].
    Monteil H; Rasoamananjara D; Vetter MT
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1986 Jun; 34(5 Pt 2):648-52. PubMed ID: 3534761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, and Fusobacteria in Antibacterial agents.
    Niederau W; Höffler U; Pulverer G
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1980; 30(12):2093-8. PubMed ID: 7194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.