118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20731267)
1. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy using modern bipolar electrosurgical instruments based on the ForceTriad energy platform.
Shen-Gunther J; Shank JJ
Mil Med; 2010 Aug; 175(8):610-5. PubMed ID: 20731267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.
Nezhat F; Mahdavi A; Nagarsheth NP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16431319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized study comparing use of THUNDERBEAT technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer.
Fagotti A; Vizzielli G; Fanfani F; Gallotta V; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Gueli-Alletti S; Avenia N; Iodice R; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 24325899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases.
Puntambekar SP; Palep RJ; Puntambekar SS; Wagh GN; Patil AM; Rayate NV; Agarwal GA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 17980327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing for radical abdominal hysterectomy.
Tamussino K; Afschar P; Reuss J; Perschler M; Ralph G; Winter R
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Feb; 96(2):320-2. PubMed ID: 15661215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The impact of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the surgery of cervical cancer patients].
Kornovski Y; Ismail E
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 23234009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experience and efficacy of a bipolar vessel sealing system for radical abdominal hysterectomy.
Kyo S; Mizumoto Y; Takakura M; Hashimoto M; Mori N; Ikoma T; Nakamura M; Inoue M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Dec; 19(9):1658-61. PubMed ID: 19955955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnifying lenses assisted nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and prevention of nerve plexus trauma.
Mantzaris G; Rodolakis A; Vlachos G; Athanasiou S; Theocharis S; Sotiripoulou ChM; Antsaklis A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 17892457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. BiClamp(®) forceps was significantly superior to conventional suture ligation in radical abdominal hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study in 391 cases.
Li L; Qie MR; Wang XL; Huang J; Zhang Q; Li DQ; He YD
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Aug; 286(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 22456787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative outcomes of bipolar energy instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Yalcin Y; Yalcin SE
Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(11):640-644. PubMed ID: 31802464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bipolar Energy Instruments in Laparoscopic Uterine Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Study.
Taşkın S; Şükür YE; Altın D; Turgay B; Varlı B; Baytaş V; Ortaç F
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Jun; 28(6):645-649. PubMed ID: 29323616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].
Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preservation of autonomic nerves in laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy.
Puntambekar SP; Patil A; Joshi SN; Rayate NV; Puntambekar SS; Agarwal GA
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 Dec; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 21091224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
