18 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20731504)
1. Tied to expectations: Predicting features speeds processing even under adverse circumstances.
Schwager S; Gaschler R; Rünger D; Frensch PA
Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):611-624. PubMed ID: 28000115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced cognitive control near the hands.
Weidler BJ; Abrams RA
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):462-9. PubMed ID: 24078099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time?
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Remington RW; Johnston JC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 15826232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
Yeh SL; Liao HI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: does internal control ability decline with age?
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kuhns D
Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18573007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
Lindsen JP; de Jong R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis: theory and empirical support.
Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):540-52. PubMed ID: 22160820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
