522 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20731511)
21. Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading.
Yan M; Zhou W; Shu H; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1069-75. PubMed ID: 22369254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
Risse S; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects of emotional word semantics in reading Chinese sentences: evidence from eye movements.
Yan M; Sommer W
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1237-43. PubMed ID: 25581226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.
Risse S; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1026-42. PubMed ID: 22428669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading.
Pynte J; Kennedy A
Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1215-27. PubMed ID: 17275060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visually complex foveal words increase the amount of parafoveal information acquired.
Yan M
Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):91-6. PubMed ID: 25911574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Previewing the neighborhood: the role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading.
Williams CC; Perea M; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1072-82. PubMed ID: 16846298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contextual constraint and N + 2 preview effects in reading.
Radach R; Inhoff AW; Glover L; Vorstius C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):619-33. PubMed ID: 23394582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: it depends where you're coming from.
Hand CJ; Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1294-313. PubMed ID: 20854004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision.
Pollatsek A; Perea M; Binder KS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Aug; 25(4):1142-58. PubMed ID: 10464947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.
Kliegl R; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 16478314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading.
Luke SG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1675-1682. PubMed ID: 30088258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading.
Risse S; Kliegl R
Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 21401266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Parafoveal preprocessing in reading revisited: evidence from a novel preview manipulation.
Gagl B; Hawelka S; Richlan F; Schuster S; Hutzler F
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):588-95. PubMed ID: 24041397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stable preview difficulty effects in reading with an improved variant of the boundary paradigm.
Risse S; Seelig S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1632-1645. PubMed ID: 30501560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words.
Yan M; Richter EM; Shu H; Kliegl R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):561-6. PubMed ID: 19451385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading.
Zhang M; Liversedge SP; Bai X; Yan G; Zang C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):812-825. PubMed ID: 31120302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
