533 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20731513)
1. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading.
Scott GG; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):783-92. PubMed ID: 22329788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.
White SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18248149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.
Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 17826758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model.
Reingold EM; Rayner K
Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):742-6. PubMed ID: 16984288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading.
Libben MR; Titone DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 19271853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006).
Rayner K; Pollatsek A; Drieghe D; Slattery TJ; Reichle ED
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):520-9; discussion 530-7. PubMed ID: 17696697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A further examination of the lexical-processing stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model.
Sheridan H; Reingold EM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 23456972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: it depends where you're coming from.
Hand CJ; Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1294-313. PubMed ID: 20854004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: evidence from noun-noun compounds.
Staub A; Rayner K; Pollatsek A; Hyönä J; Majewski H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 17983320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.
Vainio S; Hyönä J; Pajunen A
Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 19261580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences.
Yen MH; Radach R; Tzeng OJ; Hung DL; Tsai JL
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 19285294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
