100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20731519)
1. When and how are spatial perceptions scaled?
Witt JK; Proffitt DR; Epstein W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1153-60. PubMed ID: 20731519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
Waller D; Richardson AR
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
Hodgson E; Waller D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual estimation of spatial requirements for locomotion in novice wheelchair users.
Higuchi T; Takada H; Matsuura Y; Imanaka K
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Mar; 10(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15053702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it.
Witt JK; Proffitt DR; Epstein W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):880-8. PubMed ID: 16262485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference.
Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):515-26. PubMed ID: 12075885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Action-dependent perceptual invariants: from ecological to sensorimotor approaches.
Mossio M; Taraborelli D
Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1324-40. PubMed ID: 18226924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconsidering the role of movement in perceiving action-scaled affordances.
Fajen BR; Diaz G; Cramer C
Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Jun; 30(3):504-33. PubMed ID: 21333367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Walking perception by walking observers.
Jacobs A; Shiffrar M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):157-69. PubMed ID: 15709870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The timing of mentally represented actions.
Decety J; Jeannerod M; Prablanc C
Behav Brain Res; 1989 Aug; 34(1-2):35-42. PubMed ID: 2765170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond the internalism/externalism debate: the constitution of the space of perception.
Lenay C; Steiner P
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):938-52. PubMed ID: 20637654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of uncertainty in the systematic spatial mislocalization of moving objects.
Brenner E; van Beers RJ; Rotman G; Smeets JB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):811-25. PubMed ID: 16846281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceiving virtual geographical slant: action influences perception.
Creem-Regehr SH; Gooch AA; Sahm CS; Thompson WB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):811-821. PubMed ID: 15462622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
Gevers W; Lammertyn J; Notebaert W; Verguts T; Fias W
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 16423320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of effort in perceiving distance.
Proffitt DR; Stefanucci J; Banton T; Epstein W
Psychol Sci; 2003 Mar; 14(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 12661670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization.
Rieser JJ; Pick HL; Ashmead DH; Garing AE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):480-97. PubMed ID: 7790829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceiving distance: a role of effort and intent.
Witt JK; Proffitt DR; Epstein W
Perception; 2004; 33(5):577-90. PubMed ID: 15250663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multifocal intraparietal activation during discrimination of action intention in observed tool grasping.
Vingerhoets G; Honoré P; Vandekerckhove E; Nys J; Vandemaele P; Achten E
Neuroscience; 2010 Sep; 169(3):1158-67. PubMed ID: 20538048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpersonal synchronization during side by side treadmill walking is influenced by leg length differential and altered sensory feedback.
Nessler JA; Gilliland SJ
Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):772-85. PubMed ID: 19796834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
