158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20731975)
41. Impact of verbal explanation and modified consent materials on orthodontic informed consent.
Carr KM; Fields HW; Beck FM; Kang EY; Kiyak HA; Pawlak CE; Firestone AR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 22284285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Capacity to provide informed consent among adults with bipolar disorder.
Klein CC; Jolson MB; Lazarus M; Masterson B; Blom TJ; Adler CM; DelBello MP; Strakowski SM
J Affect Disord; 2019 Jan; 242():1-4. PubMed ID: 30153563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Patient and parent understanding of informed consent in orthodontics.
Mortensen MG; Kiyak HA; Omnell L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Nov; 124(5):541-50. PubMed ID: 14614422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Towards better-informed consent: Research with livestock-keepers and informal traders in East Africa.
Cooper TL; Kirino Y; Alonso S; Lindahl J; Grace D
Prev Vet Med; 2016 Jun; 128():135-41. PubMed ID: 27237399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Assessing readability and comprehension of informed consent materials for medical device research: A survey of informed consents from FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
Santel F; Bah I; Kim K; Lin JA; McCracken J; Teme A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2019 Oct; 85():105831. PubMed ID: 31445173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. User testing as a method for evaluating subjects' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis.
Ponzio M; Uccelli MM; Lionetti S; Barattini DF; Brichetto G; Zaratin P; Battaglia MA; Tacchino A
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2018 Oct; 25():108-111. PubMed ID: 30059894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Development of tool for the assessment of comprehension of informed consent form in healthy volunteers participating in first-in-human studies.
Arora A; Rajagopalan S; Shafiq N; Pandhi P; Bhalla A; Dhibar DP; Malhotra S
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Nov; 32(6):814-7. PubMed ID: 21664491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Form for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinical Trials: Results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1205 Study.
Spellecy R; Tarima S; Denzen E; Moore H; Abhyankar S; Dawson P; Foley A; Gersten I; Horwitz M; Idossa L; Joffe S; Kamani N; King R; Lazaryan A; Morris L; Horowitz MM; Majhail NS
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2018 Oct; 24(10):2145-2151. PubMed ID: 29679770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Prospective evaluation of patient comprehension of informed consent.
Crepeau AE; McKinney BI; Fox-Ryvicker M; Castelli J; Penna J; Wang ED
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Oct; 93(19):e114(1-7). PubMed ID: 22005875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Testing an alternate informed consent process.
Yates BC; Dodendorf D; Lane J; LaFramboise L; Pozehl B; Duncan K; Knodel K
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19289935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. How informed is online informed consent?
Varnhagen CK; Gushta M; Daniels J; Peters TC; Parmar N; Law D; Hirsch R; Takach BS; Johnson T
Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 16127857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Problems in comprehension of informed consent in rural and peri-urban Mali, West Africa.
Krosin MT; Klitzman R; Levin B; Cheng J; Ranney ML
Clin Trials; 2006; 3(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 16895047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Factors affecting quality of informed consent.
Lavelle-Jones C; Byrne DJ; Rice P; Cuschieri A
BMJ; 1993 Apr; 306(6882):885-90. PubMed ID: 8490411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Informed consent comprehension among vulnerable populations in Ecuador: video-delivered vs. in-person standard method.
Quevedo A; Condo C; Valenzuela G; Molina L; Castillo E; Palacio A; Pareja D; Prado G; Estrada Y; Velazquez MR; Tamariz L
Account Res; 2018; 25(5):259-272. PubMed ID: 29717898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Ethics in clinical research: need for assessing comprehension of informed consent form?
Shafiq N; Malhotra S
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Mar; 32(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 21146634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.
Montalvo W; Larson E
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Nov; 46(6):423-31. PubMed ID: 25130209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Assessing a narrated white board animation as part of the consent process for intravenous fluorescein angiography: a randomized educational study.
Mednick Z; Irrcher I; Hopman WM; Sharma S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 51(6):471-475. PubMed ID: 27938960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
Gillies K; Entwistle V; Treweek SP; Fraser C; Williamson PR; Campbell MK
Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():484. PubMed ID: 26507504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting.
Addissie A; Abay S; Feleke Y; Newport M; Farsides B; Davey G
BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Jul; 17(1):40. PubMed ID: 27406063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
