127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20732101)
1. Prediction of eye irritancy potential of surfactants by cytotoxicity tests in vitro on cultures of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes.
Cornelis M; Dupont C; Wepierre J
Toxicol In Vitro; 1992 Mar; 6(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 20732101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MTT-assay and neutral red release (NRR)-assay: relative role in the prediction of the irritancy potential of surfactants.
Korting HC; Schindler S; Hartinger A; Kerscher M; Angerpointner T; Maibach HI
Life Sci; 1994; 55(7):533-40. PubMed ID: 8041231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of surfactant cytotoxicity potential by primary cultures of ocular tissues: I. Characterization of rabbit corneal epithelial cells and initial injury and delayed toxicity studies.
Grant RL; Yao C; Gabaldon D; Acosta D
Toxicology; 1992 Nov; 76(2):153-76. PubMed ID: 1281345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discrimination of the irritancy potential of surfactants in vitro by two cytotoxicity assays using normal human keratinocytes, HaCaT cells and 3T3 mouse fibroblasts: correlation with in vivo data from a soap chamber assay.
Korting HC; Herzinger T; Hartinger A; Kerscher M; Angerpointner T; Maibach HI
J Dermatol Sci; 1994 Apr; 7(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 8060913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the potential skin irritation of lysine-derivative anionic surfactants using mouse fibroblasts and human keratinocytes as an alternative to animal testing.
Sanchez L; Mitjans M; Infante MR; Vinardell MP
Pharm Res; 2004 Sep; 21(9):1637-41. PubMed ID: 15497690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative assessment of primary skin irritants in vitro in a cytotoxicity model: comparison with in vivo human irritation tests.
Wilhelm KP; Böttjer B; Siegers CP
Br J Dermatol; 2001 Nov; 145(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 11736893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of eye and skin irritation of arginine-derivative surfactants using different in vitro endpoints as alternatives to the in vivo assays.
Martinez V; Corsini E; Mitjans M; Pinazo A; Vinardell MP
Toxicol Lett; 2006 Jul; 164(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 16472949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of proteins on the assessment of surfactant cytotoxicity by an in vitro test: Possible correlations with in vivo data.
Benoit J; Cormier M; Wepierre J
Toxicol In Vitro; 1987; 1(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 20647072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of surfactant cytotoxicity: comparison with the Draize eye test.
Tachon P; Cotovio J; Dossou KG; Prunieras M
Int J Cosmet Sci; 1989 Oct; 11(5):233-43. PubMed ID: 19456953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of two cytotoxicity tests for predicting the ocular irritancy of surfactants.
Lewis RW; McCall JC; Botham PA; Trebilcock R
Toxicol In Vitro; 1994 Aug; 8(4):867-9. PubMed ID: 20693033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An approach for development of alternative test methods based on mechanisms of skin irritation.
Osborne R; Perkins MA
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Feb; 32(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 8132172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of cytotoxicity and irritancy potential of sugar-based surfactants on skin-related 3D models.
Lu B; Miao Y; Vigneron P; Chagnault V; Grand E; Wadouachi A; Postel D; Pezron I; Egles C; Vayssade M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Apr; 40():305-312. PubMed ID: 28163247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro cytotoxicity tests on cultured human skin fibroblasts to predict skin irritation potential of surfactants.
Lee JK; Kim DB; Kim JI; Kim PY
Toxicol In Vitro; 2000 Aug; 14(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 10906441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of two cytotoxicity tests for predicting the ocular irritancy of surfactants.
Lewis RW; McCall JC; Botham PA
Toxicol In Vitro; 1993 Mar; 7(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 20732184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ocular irritation: microscopic changes occurring over time in the rat with surfactants of known irritancy.
Maurer JK; Parker RD; Carr GJ
Toxicol Pathol; 1998; 26(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 9547859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo human skin responses to consumer products and ingredients with a range of irritancy potential.
Perkins MA; Osborne R; Rana FR; Ghassemi A; Robinson MK
Toxicol Sci; 1999 Apr; 48(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 10353313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three in vitro cytotoxicity assays for estimating surfactant ocular irritation.
Vian L; Vincent J; Maurin J; Fabre I; Giroux J; Cano JP
Toxicol In Vitro; 1995 Apr; 9(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20650078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro skin irritation testing with human skin cell cultures.
Osborne R; Perkins MA
Toxicol In Vitro; 1991; 5(5-6):563-7. PubMed ID: 20732078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A critical evaluation of predicting ocular irritancy potential from an in vitro cytotoxicity assay.
Kennah HE; Albulescu D; Hignet S; Barrow CS
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1989 Feb; 12(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 2714528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of human skin cell cultures for the estimation of potential skin irritants.
Gueniche A; Ponec M
Toxicol In Vitro; 1993 Jan; 7(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 20732167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
