These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20732157)
1. An interlaboratory assessment of the Eytex system. O'Brien KA; Dixit MB; McCall JC; Botham PA; Lewis RW Toxicol In Vitro; 1992 Nov; 6(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 20732157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (11) EYTEX(TM). Matsukawa K; Masuda K; Kakishima H; Suzuki K; Nakagawa Y; Matsushige C; Imanishi Y; Nakamura T; Mizutani A; Watanabe R; Shingai T; Kaneko T; Hirose A; Ohno Y Toxicol In Vitro; 1999 Feb; 13(1):209-17. PubMed ID: 20654478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applications of the EYTEX method. Gordon VC; Kelly CP; Bergman HC Toxicol In Vitro; 1990; 4(4-5):314-7. PubMed ID: 20702185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the EYTEX system as a screen for eye irritancy of petroleum products. Roy TA; Saladdin KA; Mackerer CR Toxicol In Vitro; 1994 Aug; 8(4):797-8. PubMed ID: 20693014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the EYTEX(TM) system in the COLIPA eye irritation program. Courtellemont P; Pannetier M; Biesse JP; Larnicol M; Baret JP; Breda B Toxicol In Vitro; 1999 Apr; 13(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20654487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilization of biomacromolecular in vitro assay systems in the prediction of in vivo toxic responses. Gordon VC Lens Eye Toxic Res; 1992; 9(3-4):211-27. PubMed ID: 1301782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety evaluation of petroleum products using an in vitro eye irritation test battery. Martin SA; Roy TA; Saladdin KA; Fleming BA; Mackerer CR Toxicol In Vitro; 1994 Aug; 8(4):715-7. PubMed ID: 20692994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of low-volume, Draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. I. Hydroalcoholic formulations. Gettings SD; Lordo RA; Demetrulias J; Feder PI; Hintze KL Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Aug; 34(8):737-49. PubMed ID: 8883476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro method for estimating ocular irritation. Soto RJ; Gordon VC Toxicol In Vitro; 1990; 4(4-5):332-5. PubMed ID: 20702190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of seven in vitro alternatives for ocular safety testing. Bruner LH; Kain DJ; Roberts DA; Parker RD Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1991 Jul; 17(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 1916072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multivariate factorial analysis of data obtained in seven in vitro test systems for predicting eye irritancy. Hayashi T; Itagaki H; Fukuda T; Tamura U; Kato S Toxicol In Vitro; 1994 Apr; 8(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 20692908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An alternative test battery in detecting ocular irritancy of agrochemicals. Tavaszi J; Budai P; Pálovics A; Kismányoki A Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):891-5. PubMed ID: 19226840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A collaborative evaluation of seven alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test using pharmaceutical intermediates. Sina JF; Galer DM; Sussman RG; Gautheron PD; Sargent EV; Leong B; Shah PV; Curren RD; Miller K Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1995 Jun; 26(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 7657059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test. Spielmann H; Hoffmann S; Liebsch M; Botham P; Fentem JH; Eskes C; Roguet R; Cotovio J; Cole T; Worth A; Heylings J; Jones P; Robles C; Kandárová H; Gamer A; Remmele M; Curren R; Raabe H; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):559-601. PubMed ID: 18186667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Performance of the Tissue Equivalent Assay using the Skin(2)(TM) ZK1200 Model in the COLIPA International Validation Study on Alternatives to the Draize Eye Irritation Test. Southee JA; McPherson JP; Osborne R; Carr GJ; Rasmussen E Toxicol In Vitro; 1999 Apr; 13(2):355-73. PubMed ID: 20654493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the bovine corneal opacity-permeability assay as an in vitro alternative to the Draize eye irritation test. Vanparys P; Deknudt G; Sysmans M; Teuns G; Coussement W; Van Cauteren H Toxicol In Vitro; 1993 Jul; 7(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 20732236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing and evaluating alternative (in vitro) tests on their ability to predict the Draize maximum average score. Lordo RA; Feder PI; Gettings SD Toxicol In Vitro; 1999 Feb; 13(1):45-72. PubMed ID: 20654467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of five potential methods for assessing ocular irritation in vitro. Earl LK; Jones PA; Dixit MB; O'Brien KA Toxicol In Vitro; 1995 Jun; 9(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 20650085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test is the Method of Choice for the In Vitro Eye Irritation Testing of Agrochemical Formulations: Correlation Analysis of EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test and BCOP Test Data According to the UN GHS, US EPA and Brazil ANVISA Classification Schemes. Kolle SN; Rey Moreno MC; Mayer W; van Cott A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Jul; 43(3):181-98. PubMed ID: 26256396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interlaboratory assessment of the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Gautheron P; Giroux J; Cottin M; Audegond L; Morilla A; Mayordomo-Blanco L; Tortajada A; Haynes G; Vericat JA; Pirovano R; Gillio Tos E; Hagemann C; Vanparys P; Deknudt G; Jacobs G; Prinsen M; Kalweit S; Spielmann H Toxicol In Vitro; 1994 Jun; 8(3):381-92. PubMed ID: 20692929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]