476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20732758)
1. Quantification of the relative biological effectiveness for ion beam radiotherapy: direct experimental comparison of proton and carbon ion beams and a novel approach for treatment planning.
Elsässer T; Weyrather WK; Friedrich T; Durante M; Iancu G; Krämer M; Kragl G; Brons S; Winter M; Weber KJ; Scholz M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(4):1177-83. PubMed ID: 20732758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The FLUKA Monte Carlo code coupled with the local effect model for biological calculations in carbon ion therapy.
Mairani A; Brons S; Cerutti F; Fassò A; Ferrari A; Krämer M; Parodi K; Scholz M; Sommerer F
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4273-89. PubMed ID: 20647603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing normal tissue sparing in ion therapy using calculated isoeffective dose for ion selection.
Remmes NB; Herman MG; Kruse JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):756-62. PubMed ID: 22436796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy.
Frese MC; Yu VK; Stewart RD; Carlson DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):442-50. PubMed ID: 22099045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic splitting of Gaussian pencil beams in heterogeneity-correction algorithms for radiotherapy with heavy charged particles.
Kanematsu N; Komori M; Yonai S; Ishizaki A
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2015-27. PubMed ID: 19287085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct comparison of biologically optimized spread-out bragg peaks for protons and carbon ions.
Wilkens JJ; Oelfke U
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):262-6. PubMed ID: 17935903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biophysical modelling of proton radiation effects based on amorphous track models.
Paganetti H; Goitein M
Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Sep; 77(9):911-28. PubMed ID: 11576451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of the local effect model for the prediction of biologic effects of carbon ion beams in vitro and in vivo.
Elsässer T; Krämer M; Scholz M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 18430521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The increased biological effectiveness of heavy charged particles: from radiobiology to treatment planning.
Krämer M; Weyrather WK; Scholz M
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2003 Oct; 2(5):427-36. PubMed ID: 14529307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiotherapy systems using proton and carbon beams.
Jongen Y
Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg; 2008; 163(10-12):471-8; discussion 479-80. PubMed ID: 20120253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PET monitoring of cancer therapy with 3He and 12C beams: a study with the GEANT4 toolkit.
Pshenichnov I; Larionov A; Mishustin I; Greiner W
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(24):7295-312. PubMed ID: 18065840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Irradiation of mixed beam and design of spread-out Bragg peak for heavy-ion radiotherapy.
Kanai T; Furusawa Y; Fukutsu K; Itsukaichi H; Eguchi-Kasai K; Ohara H
Radiat Res; 1997 Jan; 147(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 8989373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A semi-analytical radiobiological model may assist treatment planning in light ion radiotherapy.
Kundrát P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6813-30. PubMed ID: 18029977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment planning for a scanned carbon beam with a modified microdosimetric kinetic model.
Inaniwa T; Furukawa T; Kase Y; Matsufuji N; Toshito T; Matsumoto Y; Furusawa Y; Noda K
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(22):6721-37. PubMed ID: 21030747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modelling carcinogenesis after radiotherapy using Poisson statistics: implications for IMRT, protons and ions.
Jones B
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A143-57. PubMed ID: 19454805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of potential advantages of relevant ions for particle therapy: a model based study.
Grün R; Friedrich T; Krämer M; Zink K; Durante M; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Scholz M
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):1037-47. PubMed ID: 25652516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental characterization of lateral profiles of scanned proton and carbon ion pencil beams for improved beam models in ion therapy treatment planning.
Schwaab J; Brons S; Fieres J; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 56(24):7813-27. PubMed ID: 22112370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empirical model estimation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beam therapy.
Chen Y; Ahmad S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 21593038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological dose optimization with multiple ion fields.
Gemmel A; Hasch B; Ellerbrock M; Weyrather WK; Krämer M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6991-7012. PubMed ID: 19001692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of cellular lethality in DNA repair-proficient or -deficient cell lines resulting from exposure to 70 MeV/n protons or 290 MeV/n carbon ions.
Genet SC; Maeda J; Fujisawa H; Yurkon CR; Fujii Y; Romero AM; Genik PC; Fujimori A; Kitamura H; Kato TA
Oncol Rep; 2012 Nov; 28(5):1591-6. PubMed ID: 22923057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
