These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20732904)

  • 1. From the most fleeting of glimpses: on the time course for the extraction of distance information.
    Gajewski DA; Philbeck JW; Pothier S; Chichka D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1446-53. PubMed ID: 20732904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.
    Gajewski DA; Philbeck JW; Wirtz PW; Chichka D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):361-77. PubMed ID: 24099588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Roles for Prior Visual Experience and Age on the Extraction of Egocentric Distance.
    Wallin CP; Gajewski DA; Teplitz RW; Mihelic Jaidzeka S; Philbeck JW
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2017 Jan; 72(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 27473147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effects of Age and Set Size on the Fast Extraction of Egocentric Distance.
    Gajewski DA; Wallin CP; Philbeck JW
    Vis cogn; 2015; 23(8):957-988. PubMed ID: 27398065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy.
    Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC
    Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking.
    Kunz BR; Wouters L; Smith D; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1284-93. PubMed ID: 19633344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: implications for real and virtual indoor environments.
    Creem-Regehr SH; Willemsen P; Gooch AA; Thompson WB
    Perception; 2005; 34(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 15832569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociation between visual perception of allocentric distance and visually directed walking of its extent.
    Kudoh N
    Perception; 2005; 34(11):1399-416. PubMed ID: 16355744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proprioceptive Distance Cues Restore Perfect Size Constancy in Grasping, but Not Perception, When Vision Is Limited.
    Chen J; Sperandio I; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 2018 Mar; 28(6):927-932.e4. PubMed ID: 29502946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gaze behavior and the perception of egocentric distance.
    Gajewski DA; Wallin CP; Philbeck JW
    J Vis; 2014 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 24453346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is size perception based on monocular distance cues computed automatically?
    Goldfarb L; Tzelgov J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):751-4. PubMed ID: 16447392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Looking at perspective pictures from too far, too close, and just right.
    Juricevic I; Kennedy JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):448-61. PubMed ID: 16846274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enumerating by pointing to locations: a new method for measuring the numerosity of visual object representations.
    Haladjian HH; Pylyshyn ZW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 21264734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?
    Dickinson CA; Intraub H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1251-62. PubMed ID: 19633341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual distance estimation in static compared to moving virtual scenes.
    Frenz H; Lappe M
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 17120711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tachistoscopic exposure and masking of real three-dimensional scenes.
    Pothier S; Philbeck J; Chichka D; Gajewski DA
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Feb; 41(1):107-112. PubMed ID: 19182129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invalidly cued targets are well localized when detected.
    Gajewski DA; Zhang J; Shomstein S; Nah JC; Philbeck JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1757-1766. PubMed ID: 31214970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical position as a cue to pictorial depth: height in the picture plane versus distance to the horizon.
    Gardner JS; Austerweil JL; Palmer SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 20139458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning fine-grained and category information in navigable real-world space.
    Uttal DH; Friedman A; Hand LL; Warren C
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1026-40. PubMed ID: 21156867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating distance in real and virtual environments: Does order make a difference?
    Ziemer CJ; Plumert JM; Cremer JF; Kearney JK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1095-106. PubMed ID: 19525540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.