These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20733023)

  • 1. Adaptation of a digital camera for simultaneous stereophotography in ophthalmology.
    Stingl K; Hoffmann E; Schiefer U
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 94(10):1288-90. PubMed ID: 20733023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous stereoscopic fundus camera incorporating a single optical axis.
    Donaldson DD; Prescott R; Kennedy S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Mar; 19(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 7358479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the clinical utility of stereoscopic clinical photography.
    Brack CD; Kessel IL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():42-4. PubMed ID: 18391253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination of glaucomatous optic neuropathy by digital stereoscopic analysis.
    Morgan JE; Sheen NJ; North RV; Goyal R; Morgan S; Ansari E; Wild JM
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):855-62. PubMed ID: 15878066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
    Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of the polaroid and digital non-mydriatic cameras in the detection of referrable diabetic retinopathy in Australia.
    Phiri R; Keeffe JE; Harper CA; Taylor HR
    Diabet Med; 2006 Aug; 23(8):867-72. PubMed ID: 16911624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; Morgan W; Tay-Kearney ML; Jitskaia L
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10529928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative reproducibility of the digital photogrammetric procedure utilizing three methods of stereophotography.
    Rosenthal AR; Kottler MS; Donaldson DD; Falconer DG
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1977 Jan; 16(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 832965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reflex-free digital fundus photography using a simple and portable camera adaptor system. A viable alternative.
    Pirie CG; Pizzirani S
    J Vis Commun Med; 2011 Dec; 34(4):146-55. PubMed ID: 22229473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparability of cup and disk diameters measured from nonstereoscopic digital and stereoscopic film images.
    Ewen A; Lee KE; Klein BE; Klein R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 141(6):1126-1128. PubMed ID: 16765683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ophthalmic photography using a digital camera.
    Fogla R; Rao SK
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 51(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 14601858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computer algorithm to quantitatively assess quality of digital optic disc images.
    Moscaritolo M; Jampel H; Zimmer-Galler I; Knezevich F; Zeimer R
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010; 41(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 20307051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can light-field photography ease focusing on the scalp and oral cavity?
    Taheri A; Feldman SR
    Skin Res Technol; 2013 Aug; 19(3):288-90. PubMed ID: 23331377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital photography using the intraoperative microscope in neurosurgery.
    Yanni DS; Beshara M; Ebersole K; Giannotta S; Schulder M
    Surg Neurol; 2009 Aug; 72(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 18617255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of modified portable digital camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy.
    Chalam KV; Brar VS; Keshavamurthy R
    Ophthalmic Res; 2009; 42(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 19478543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D vs 2D qualitative and semiquantitative evaluation of the glaucomatous optic disc atrophy using computer-assisted stereophotography.
    Lehmann MV; Mardin CY; Martus P; Bergua A
    Eye (Lond); 2008 May; 22(5):628-35. PubMed ID: 17401328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Real time eye tracking with the CMOS 2 camera system].
    Markert S; Berkes S; Goetze A; Plagwitz KU; Husar P; Henning G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():652-5. PubMed ID: 12465265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The St. Gallen digital ophthalmological imaging system].
    Török B; Bischoff P
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Apr; 219(4):306-10. PubMed ID: 12022025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of digital cameras: features essential for the orthopaedic surgeon.
    Andres BM; Khanna AJ; Wenz JF; Faust AF; Frassica FJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Apr; (421):10-6. PubMed ID: 15123919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.