These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20733443)
1. Titrated oral misoprostol solution compared with intravenous oxytocin for labor augmentation: a randomized controlled trial. Ho M; Cheng SY; Li TC Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 116(3):612-618. PubMed ID: 20733443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Titrated oral misoprostol for augmenting labour to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. Vogel JP; West HM; Dowswell T Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):CD010648. PubMed ID: 24058051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor. Rouzi AA; Alsahly N; Alamoudi R; Almansouri N; Alsinani N; Alkafy S; Rozzah R; Abduljabbar H Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):405.e1-405.e6. PubMed ID: 27986461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oral misoprostol for labor augmentation: a randomized controlled trial. Bleich AT; Villano KS; Lo JY; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 118(6):1255-1260. PubMed ID: 22105254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation. Wing DA; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Souza AS; Feitosa FE; Costa AA; Pereira AP; Carvalho AS; Paixão RM; Katz L; Amorim MM Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 123(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 24112746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL. Mbaluka CM; Kamau K; Karanja JG; Mugo N East Afr Med J; 2014 Sep; 91(9):303-10. PubMed ID: 26866082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy comparison of titrated oral solution of misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin on labour induction in women with full-term pregnancy. Kashanian M; Eshraghi N; Rahimi M; Sheikhansari N; Javanmanesh F J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 31195867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Induction of labor with titrated oral misoprostol solution versus oxytocin in term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial. Aalami-Harandi R; Karamali M; Moeini A Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 35(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 23412004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial. Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-dose vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal misoprostol for midtrimester labor induction: a randomized trial. Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Biggio JR; Owen J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1065-70. PubMed ID: 16157113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations. Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oral Misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol followed by oxytocin for labour induction in women with hypertension in pregnancy (MOLI): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Bracken H; Lightly K; Mundle S; Kerr R; Faragher B; Easterling T; Leigh S; Turner M; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jul; 21(1):537. PubMed ID: 34325670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Wing DA; Park MR; Paul RH Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):905-8. PubMed ID: 10831989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial. Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction. Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review. Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of vaginal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour in women with intra uterine fetal death in Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Nakintu N Afr Health Sci; 2001 Dec; 1(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 12789117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]