BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20733453)

  • 1. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
    Barnett JC; Judd JP; Wu JM; Scales CD; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 116(3):685-693. PubMed ID: 20733453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective comparison of costs between robotics, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in endometrial cancer among women with Class III obesity or higher.
    Kosa SD; Ferguson SE; Panzarella T; Lau S; Abitbol J; Samouëlian V; Giede C; Steed H; Renkosinski B; Gien LT; Bernardini MQ
    J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):747-753. PubMed ID: 34904716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.
    Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Minimally Invasive Colectomy.
    Simianu VV; Gaertner WB; Kuntz K; Kwaan MR; Lowry AC; Madoff RD; Jensen CC
    Ann Surg; 2020 Aug; 272(2):334-341. PubMed ID: 32675547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A retrospective evaluation of the perioperative drug use and comparison of its cost in robotic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer.
    Agarwal R; Rajanbabu A; Unnikrishnan UG
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):665-672. PubMed ID: 29569172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
    Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications.
    Cusimano MC; Simpson AN; Dossa F; Liani V; Kaur Y; Acuna SA; Robertson D; Satkunaratnam A; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Baxter NN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):410-428.e19. PubMed ID: 31082383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.
    Corrado G; Vizza E; Cela V; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Legge F; Ciccarone F; Mancini E; Gallotta V; Baiocco E; Monterossi G; Perri MT; Zampa A; Pasciuto T; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 30245146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost comparison between open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review of segmental costs.
    Morii Y; Osawa T; Suzuki T; Shinohara N; Harabayashi T; Ishikawa T; Tanikawa T; Yamashina H; Ogasawara K
    BMC Urol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):110. PubMed ID: 31703573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
    Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ind T; Laios A; Hacking M; Nobbenhuis M
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Dec; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28762635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Surgical Approaches to Proctectomy.
    Simianu VV; Curran T; Gaertner WB; Sklow B; Kuntz KM; Kwaan MR; Madoff RD; Jensen CC
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jun; 25(6):1512-1523. PubMed ID: 32394122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic evaluation of different routes of surgery for the management of endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Moss EL; Morgan G; Martin A; Sarhanis P; Ind T
    BMJ Open; 2021 May; 11(5):e045888. PubMed ID: 33986058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multidirectional Traction Method Using SURGICEL NU-KNIT and Surgical Suture in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer.
    Yamauchi K; Sekiyama K; Otsuki M; Nakamura S; Kawai E; Kojima M; Kozono Y; Okuda A; Yoshioka Y; Higuchi T
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Jan; 31(1):12-13. PubMed ID: 37875212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All-cause 30- and 90-day inpatient readmission costs associated with 4 minimally invasive colon surgery approaches: A propensity-matched analysis using Medicare and commercial claims data.
    Sosa MP; McNicholas DG; Bebla AB; Needham KA; Starker PM
    Surg Open Sci; 2022 Oct; 10():158-164. PubMed ID: 36237948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short-Term Outcome of Robotic versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in Women with Diabetes: Analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
    Shen HP; Tseng CJ
    J Clin Med; 2023 Dec; 12(24):. PubMed ID: 38137781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effective minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: emphasizing surgical efficiency.
    Misal M; Delara R; Wasson MN
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 32(4):243-247. PubMed ID: 32371608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Achieving robotic program best practice performance and cost versus laparoscopy: Two case studies define a framework for optimization.
    Feldstein J; Coussons H
    Int J Med Robot; 2020 Jun; 16(3):e2098. PubMed ID: 32096901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
    Fotiou A; Kokkali K; Psomiadou V; Iavazzo C
    Updates Surg; 2023 Aug; 75(5):1373-1374. PubMed ID: 37430096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.
    Alshowaikh K; Karpinska-Leydier K; Amirthalingam J; Paidi G; Iroshani Jayarathna AI; Salibindla DBAMR; Ergin HE
    Cureus; 2021 Aug; 13(8):e16828. PubMed ID: 34367836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.