These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of transverse and vertical skin incisions for Caesarean section. Haeri AD S Afr Med J; 1976 Jan; 50(2):33-4. PubMed ID: 1251272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time between skin incision and delivery during cesarean. Rossouw JN; Hall D; Harvey J Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 121(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 23340272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uterine incision-to-delivery interval and perinatal outcomes in transverse versus vertical incisions in preterm cesarean deliveries. Luthra G; Gawade P; Starikov R; Markenson G J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Dec; 26(18):1788-91. PubMed ID: 23834536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative safety of the low transverse versus the low vertical uterine incision for cesarean delivery of breech infants. Schutterman EB; Grimes DA Obstet Gynecol; 1983 May; 61(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 6835613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. REMOVED: The relationship between primary cesarean delivery skin incision type and wound complications in women with morbid obesity. Marrs CC; Moussa HN; Sibai BM; Blackwell SC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 210(4):319. PubMed ID: 24560557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal outcome in emergency versus elective cesarean sections at Souissi Maternity Hospital, Rabat, Morocco. Benzouina S; Boubkraoui Mel-M; Mrabet M; Chahid N; Kharbach A; El-Hassani A; Barkat A Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 23():197. PubMed ID: 27347286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The case for trial of labor in the patient with a prior low-segment vertical cesarean incision. Martin JN; Perry KG; Roberts WE; Meydrech EF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 177(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 9240598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrapartum uterine rupture and dehiscence in patients with prior lower uterine segment vertical and transverse incisions. Shipp TD; Zelop CM; Repke JT; Cohen A; Caughey AB; Lieberman E Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 1):735-40. PubMed ID: 10546720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midline versus transverse incision for cesarean delivery in low-income countries. Maaløe N; Aabakke AJ; Secher NJ Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Apr; 125(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24486123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uterine incision and maternal morbidity after cesarean section for delivery of the very low birthweight fetus. Druzin ML; Hutson JM; San Roman G Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Aug; 169(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 2756460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Type of skin incision and wound complications in the obese parturient. McLean M; Hines R; Polinkovsky M; Stuebe A; Thorp J; Strauss R Am J Perinatol; 2012 Apr; 29(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 22105439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of 2 techniques. Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Siesto G; Loverro G; Bolis P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):292.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18771988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Fetal outcome following cesarean section in premature labor. Isthmocorpus longitudinal section or isthmian transverse section?]. Dietl J; Dannecker G; Goretzki K; Hirsch HA Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Jan; 48(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 3350321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transverse uterine incision for cesarean delivery of the transverse-lying fetus. Shoham Z; Blickstein I; Zosmer A; Katz Z; Borenstein R Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1989 Aug; 32(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 2776958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The "intra-abdominal version technique" for delivery of transverse lie by low-segment cesarean section. Pelosi MA; Apuzzio J; Fricchione D; Gowda VV Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Dec; 135(8):1009-11. PubMed ID: 517583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]