278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20734371)
1. Intra- and interoperator reliability of manual and semi-automated measurement of fetal nuchal translucency by sonographers with different levels of experience.
Abele H; Hoopmann M; Wright D; Hoffmann-Poell B; Huettelmaier M; Pintoffl K; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 20734371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperator and interoperator repeatability of manual and semi-automated measurement of increased fetal nuchal translucency according to the operator's experience.
Kagan KO; Abele H; Yazdi B; Böer B; Pintoffl K; Wright D; Hoopmann M
Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1229-33. PubMed ID: 22024964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and interoperator reliability of manual and semi-automated measurements of intracranial translucency.
Karl K; Kagan KO; Chaoui R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 39(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 22081521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semi-automated system for measurement of nuchal translucency thickness.
Moratalla J; Pintoffl K; Minekawa R; Lachmann R; Wright D; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 20617517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of manual and semi-automated measurements of nuchal translucency by experienced operators.
Pruksanusak N; Pranpanus S; Suwanrath C; Kor-anantakul O; Suntharasaj T; Hanprasertpong T; Liabsuetrakul T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 121(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 23499134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal caliper placement: manual vs automated methods.
Yazdi B; Zanker P; Wanger P; Sonek J; Pintoffl K; Hoopmann M; Kagan KO
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 23671025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra- and interoperator repeatability of the nuchal translucency measurement.
Pajkrt E; Mol BW; Boer K; Drogtrop AP; Bossuyt PM; Bilardo CM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 15(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 10895448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-operator and inter-operator reliability of manual and semiautomated measurement of fetal nuchal translucency: a cross sectional study.
Bakker M; Mulder P; Birnie E; Bilardo CM
Prenat Diagn; 2013 Dec; 33(13):1264-71. PubMed ID: 24114986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of tissue harmonic imaging on measurement of nuchal translucency thickness.
Pasquini L; Tondi F; Rizzello F; Pontello V; Paoletti E; Fontanarosa M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):423-6. PubMed ID: 20205154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semi-automated adjusted measurement of nuchal translucency: feasibility and reproducibility.
Grangé G; Althuser M; Fresson J; Bititi A; Miyamoto K; Tsatsaris V; Morel O
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 20814873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison and reproducibility of nuchal translucency measurements using two-dimensional and volume nuchal translucency ultrasound: a prospective study.
Van Keirsbilck J; Dewulf V; Van Calsteren K; De Catte L
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2013; 34(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23920132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Audit on nuchal translucency thickness measurements in Flanders, Belgium: a plea for methodological standardization.
Gyselaers WJ; Vereecken AJ; Van Herck EJ; Straetmans DP; de Jonge ET; Ombelet WU; Nijhuis JG
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 15459938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of nuchal translucency measurement depends on equipment used and its calibration.
Axell RG; Gillett A; Pasupathy D; Chudleigh T; Brockelsby J; White PA; Lees CC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24448754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of sonographer nuchal translucency measurement performance--central tendency and dispersion.
Sahota DS; Chen M; Leung TY; Chan LW; Fung TY; Ting YH; Lau TK
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Jun; 24(6):812-6. PubMed ID: 21265719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of image setting on intracranial translucency measurement by manual and semi-automated system.
Zhen L; Yang X; Ting YH; Chen M; Leung TY
Prenat Diagn; 2013 Sep; 33(9):889-93. PubMed ID: 23658138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of deviation from the mid-sagittal plane on the measurement of fetal nuchal translucency.
Abele H; Wagner N; Hoopmann M; Grischke EM; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 20183863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Likelihood ratio-based quality control for nuchal translucency measurements at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
Salomon LJ; Porcher R; Stirnemann JJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 37(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 20814879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra- and interoperator variability in fetal nasal bone assessment at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
Senat MV; Bernard JP; Boulvain M; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Aug; 22(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 12905506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality assurance of nuchal translucency for prenatal fetal Down syndrome screening.
Sahota DS; Leung WC; To WK; Chan WP; Lau TK; Leung TY
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Jul; 25(7):1039-43. PubMed ID: 21854135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Real-time three-dimensional ultrasound with Live xPlane imaging assists first-trimester acquisition of a true midsagittal section.
Xiong Y; Wah YM; Chan LW; Leung TY; Fung TY; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 20201112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
