145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20734649)
1. [Our and foreign experience in surgical treatment of CIN III-cold knife conisation versus LLETZ].
Boyadzhieva M; Atanassova I; Dimitrova V; Zaharieva S; Tankova T; Grozeva G; Todorova K; Stoykova V; Kedikova S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010; 49(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 20734649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [LASER CONISATION VS. COLD KNIFE CONISATION FOR CIN].
Karagyozov I
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27514128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cold-knife conisation and large loop excision of transformation zone significantly increase the risk for spontaneous preterm birth: a population-based cohort study.
Jančar N; Mihevc Ponikvar B; Tomšič S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():245-9. PubMed ID: 27359080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cone measurements and residual disease in LLETZ conisation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Antonakou A; Sindos M; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Sakellaropoulos G; Antsaklis A
In Vivo; 2011; 25(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 21709016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).
Phadnis SV; Atilade A; Young MP; Evans H; Walker PG
BJOG; 2010 Apr; 117(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 20156211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of conization type on the resected cone volume: results of a retrospective multi-center study.
Grimm C; Brammen L; Sliutz G; Weigert M; Sevelda P; Pils S; Reinthaller A; Polterauer S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 288(5):1081-6. PubMed ID: 23649464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of cervical premalignant lesions.
Lindeque BG
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 19(4):545-61. PubMed ID: 16150393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins.
Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The advantages of CO2 laser use in treatment of cervix dysplasia].
Küppers V; Degen KW; Dominik S; Sert S; Somville T
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jul; 54(7):401-5. PubMed ID: 7926572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiosurgical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Reinthaller A; Kainz C; Tempfer G; Joura E
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 7950445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of the recurrence and residual lesions incidence after loop electroexcisional procedure and cold knife conisation].
Kabzińska-Turek M; Basta A; Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K; Knafel A; Zajac K; Przybylska-Jurecka P; Jach R; Milewicz T
Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(9):658-62. PubMed ID: 23401984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) without histological proof of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion: Results of a two-year continuous retrospective study.
Pecourt M; Gondry J; Foulon A; Lanta-Delmas S; Sergent F; Chevreau J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 49(6):101621. PubMed ID: 31430562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Hiramatsu K; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Morii E; Enomoto T; Kimura T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 23395556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized trial comparing limited-excision conisation to Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) in cervical dysplasia patients.
Kolben TM; Etzel LT; Bergauer F; Hagemann I; Hillemanns P; Repper M; Kaufmann AM; Sotlar K; Kolben T; Helms HJ; Gallwas J; Mahner S; Dannecker C
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e42. PubMed ID: 30887760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of cervical conisation on pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis.
Zhuang H; Hong S; Zheng L; Zhang L; Zhuang X; Wei H; Yang Y
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 29884103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [COLPOSCOPY ASSISTED LASER MICROSURGERY FOR CERVICAL PATHOLOGY].
Karagyozov I
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2015; 54(9):9-16. PubMed ID: 26863789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary on 'Sequential cervical length screening in pregnancies after LLETZ conisation: a retrospective analysis'.
Iams J
BJOG; 2014 Mar; 121(4):463. PubMed ID: 24734273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
