These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20735265)

  • 1. A modified plastic shell technique for cement-retained implant restorations.
    Ozçelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 20735265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What's your choice: cement- or screw-retained implant restorations?
    Strong SM
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18254555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A crown venting technique for the cementation of implant-supported crowns.
    Schwedhelm ER; Lepe X; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 12589295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A screwless and cementless technique for the restoration of single-tooth implants: a retrospective cohort study.
    Urdaneta RA; Marincola M; Weed M; Chuang SK
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):562-71. PubMed ID: 18761575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study.
    Santosa RE; Martin W; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technique for fabricating a cement-retained single-unit implant-supported provisional restoration in the esthetic zone.
    Ganddini MR; Tallents RH; Ercoli C; Ganddini R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):296-8. PubMed ID: 16126084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single-Unit Cement-Retained Implant Restorations: Strategies, Protocols, and Techniques.
    Schoenbaum T; Stevenson RG; Moshaverinia A
    Dent Today; 2017 Jun; 36(6):64-8. PubMed ID: 29231669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A laboratory procedure for optimal implant abutment preparation.
    Ozcelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):537-40. PubMed ID: 19500234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anterior single-tooth implant restorations.
    Lewis S
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Feb; 15(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 7591521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained multiunit implant restoration.
    Uludag B; Celik G
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):248-50. PubMed ID: 17069169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis.
    Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Traini T; Di lorio D; Caputi S
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 16564081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
    Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A technique for locating implant abutment screws of posterior cement-retained metal-ceramic restorations with ceramic occlusal surfaces.
    Schwedhelm ER; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 16473092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments.
    Keith SE; Miller BH; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 10379110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.
    Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 18783414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.