These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20736684)

  • 1. AM last page. Reliability and validity in educational measurement.
    Artino AR; Durning SJ; Creel AH
    Acad Med; 2010 Sep; 85(9):1545. PubMed ID: 20736684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of checklists and global ratings by standardized students, trained raters, and faculty raters in an objective structured teaching environment.
    Quirk M; Mazor K; Haley HL; Wellman S; Keller D; Hatem D; Keller LA
    Teach Learn Med; 2005; 17(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 16042515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity, reliability, and defensibility of assessments in veterinary education.
    Hecker K; Violato C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 19861713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collecting evidence of content validity for the international foundations of medicine examination: an expert-based judgmental approach.
    De Champlain AF; Grabovsky I; Scoles PV; Pannizzo L; Winward M; Dermine A; Himpens B
    Teach Learn Med; 2011 Apr; 23(2):144-7. PubMed ID: 21516601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment in medical education.
    Murphy JF
    Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):356. PubMed ID: 17432806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unsigned: why anonymous evaluations in clinical settings are counterproductive.
    Guerrasio J; Weissberg M
    Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 46(10):928-30. PubMed ID: 22989124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Who does make up the standard?].
    Tranum-Jensen J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):209-11. PubMed ID: 11831093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A plea for the proper use of criterion-referenced tests in medical assessment.
    Ricketts C
    Med Educ; 2009 Dec; 43(12):1141-6. PubMed ID: 19930504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardised versus individualised assessment: related problems divided by a common language.
    Schuwirth L; Swanson D
    Med Educ; 2013 Jun; 47(6):627-31. PubMed ID: 23662880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment in medical education.
    de Galan BE; van Gurp PJ; Stuyt PM
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(20):2108-9; author reply 2110. PubMed ID: 17514782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Back to the future: medical students can matter again.
    Alpert JS; Mandell BF
    Am J Med; 2009 Nov; 122(11):971-2. PubMed ID: 19854318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the evaluation system.
    Sharma SK
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2010; 8(29):1-2. PubMed ID: 21209498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should medical student assessment be by standards or by rank?
    Fontaine S; Wilkinson TJ
    N Z Med J; 2001 Jul; 114(1135):314-5. PubMed ID: 11556446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Medical studies today and tomorrow. Critical considerations of the current teaching system].
    Arnold M
    Fortschr Med; 1977 May; 95(18):1179-80, 1215. PubMed ID: 863357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct observation in medical education: a review of the literature and evidence for validity.
    Fromme HB; Karani R; Downing SM
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2009 Aug; 76(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 19642150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conceptualising and classifying validity evidence for simulation.
    Andreatta PB; Gruppen LD
    Med Educ; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1028-35. PubMed ID: 19874494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A wider perspective on assessment.
    Eraut M
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):803-4. PubMed ID: 15271039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analyzing the obstacles to an effective evaluation process.
    Stringham R
    Fam Med; 2010 Jan; 42(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 20063211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oral assessment and postgraduate medical examinations: establishing conditions for validity, reliability and fairness.
    Memon MA; Joughin GR; Memon B
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 May; 15(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 18386152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Falling standard of examinations in the medical sciences.
    Arya TV
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1992 Sep; 40(9):634-5. PubMed ID: 1308030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.