BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20737196)

  • 21. Bayesian estimation of genetic parameters for multivariate threshold and continuous phenotypes and molecular genetic data in simulated horse populations using Gibbs sampling.
    Stock KF; Distl O; Hoeschele I
    BMC Genet; 2007 May; 8():19. PubMed ID: 17490471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits.
    MacLeod IM; Bowman PJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Haile-Mariam M; Kemper KE; Chamberlain AJ; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Feb; 17():144. PubMed ID: 26920147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
    Waldmann P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A genome scan for quantitative trait loci influencing carcass, post-natal growth and reproductive traits in commercial Angus cattle.
    McClure MC; Morsci NS; Schnabel RD; Kim JW; Yao P; Rolf MM; McKay SD; Gregg SJ; Chapple RH; Northcutt SL; Taylor JF
    Anim Genet; 2010 Dec; 41(6):597-607. PubMed ID: 20477797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implementing a QTL detection study (GWAS) using genomic prediction methodology.
    Garrick DJ; Fernando RL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():275-98. PubMed ID: 23756895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bayesian Modeling for Epistasis Analysis Using Data-Driven Reversible Jump.
    Zuanetti DA; Milan LA
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(3):1495-1506. PubMed ID: 33301408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Extent and consistency of linkage disequilibrium and identification of DNA markers for production and egg quality traits in commercial layer chicken populations.
    Abasht B; Sandford E; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Hassen A; Habier D; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Lamont SJ
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Jul; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. PubMed ID: 19607653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of epistasis among finite polygenic loci for complex traits with a mixed model using Gibbs sampling.
    Lee C; Park J
    J Biomed Inform; 2007 Oct; 40(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 17321801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Deep learning versus parametric and ensemble methods for genomic prediction of complex phenotypes.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Gianola D; Peñagaricano F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Feb; 52(1):12. PubMed ID: 32093611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bayesian reversible-jump for epistasis analysis in genomic studies.
    Balestre M; de Souza CL
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Dec; 17(1):1012. PubMed ID: 27938339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.
    van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC
    BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mapping quantitative trait loci with epistatic effects.
    Yi N; Xu S
    Genet Res; 2002 Apr; 79(2):185-98. PubMed ID: 12073556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predictive ability of genome-assisted statistical models under various forms of gene action.
    Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhi A; Kranis A; Tusell L; Morota G; Rosa GJM; Gianola D
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12309. PubMed ID: 30120288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inferring genetic values for quantitative traits non-parametrically.
    Gianola D; de los Campos G
    Genet Res (Camb); 2008 Dec; 90(6):525-40. PubMed ID: 19123970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bayesian mapping of genome-wide epistatic imprinted loci for quantitative traits.
    Li S; Wang X; Li J; Yang T; Min L; Liu Y; Lin M; Yang R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2012 May; 124(8):1561-71. PubMed ID: 22350088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genomic Prediction Using Multi-trait Weighted GBLUP Accounting for Heterogeneous Variances and Covariances Across the Genome.
    Karaman E; Lund MS; Anche MT; Janss L; Su G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Nov; 8(11):3549-3558. PubMed ID: 30194089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors influencing QTL mapping accuracy under complicated genetic models by computer simulation.
    Su CF; Wang W; Gong SL; Zuo JH; Li SJ
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 Dec; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 28002599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian neural networks with variable selection for prediction of genotypic values.
    van Bergen GHH; Duenk P; Albers CA; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Kappen HJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 May; 52(1):26. PubMed ID: 32414320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.