These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20737295)
41. Influence of Information Framing on Patient Decisions to Treat Actinic Keratosis. Berry K; Butt M; Kirby JS JAMA Dermatol; 2017 May; 153(5):421-426. PubMed ID: 28114674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Do visual aids influenced patients' risk perceptions for rare and very rare risks? Fraenkel L; Reyna V; Cozmuta R; Cornell D; Nolte J; Wilhelms E Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Nov; 101(11):1900-1905. PubMed ID: 30305252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. O'Connor AM; Bennett CL; Stacey D; Barry M; Col NF; Eden KB; Entwistle VA; Fiset V; Holmes-Rovner M; Khangura S; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Rovner D Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jul; (3):CD001431. PubMed ID: 19588325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Lipkus IM; Samsa G; Rimer BK Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 11206945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Roberts TR; Derry HA; Ubel PA J Health Commun; 2008 Mar; 13(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 18300064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Communicating risk in dementia care: Survey of health and social care professionals. Taylor BJ; Stevenson M; McDowell M Health Soc Care Community; 2018 Mar; 26(2):e291-e303. PubMed ID: 29226458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study. McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Communicating telecom fraud risk in anti-telefraud messages: The effects of metaphorical frames on attitudes. Liu M; Chen J Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1093933. PubMed ID: 36726509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Understanding the role of numeracy in health: proposed theoretical framework and practical insights. Lipkus IM; Peters E Health Educ Behav; 2009 Dec; 36(6):1065-81. PubMed ID: 19834054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Framing Obesity: Effects of Obesity Labeling and Prevalence Statistics on Public Perceptions. Liu J; Lee B; McLeod DM; Choung H Health Educ Behav; 2019 Apr; 46(2):322-328. PubMed ID: 30117341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Framing effects in risk communication messages - Hazard identification vs. risk assessment. Freudenstein F; Croft RJ; Wiedemann PM; Verrender A; Böhmert C; Loughran SP Environ Res; 2020 Nov; 190():109934. PubMed ID: 32755556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The (ir)relevance of framing nutrition education messages. Brug J; Ruiter RA; van Assema P Nutr Health; 2003; 17(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 12803277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Is patients' numeracy related to physical and mental health? Garcia-Retamero R; Andrade A; Sharit J; Ruiz JG Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):501-11. PubMed ID: 25943579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Why public health framing matters: An experimental study of the effects of COVID-19 framing on prejudice and xenophobia in the United States. Dhanani LY; Franz B Soc Sci Med; 2021 Jan; 269():113572. PubMed ID: 33321405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions. Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Utilization of Continuous "Spinners" to Communicate Risk. Eyler RF; Cordes S; Szymanski BR; Fraenkel L Med Decis Making; 2017 Aug; 37(6):725-729. PubMed ID: 28490227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ubel PA; Smith DM; Derry HA; McClure JB; Stark A; Pitsch RK; Fagerlin A Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Nov; 73(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 18602242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Patients prefer pictures to numbers to express cardiovascular benefit from treatment. Goodyear-Smith F; Arroll B; Chan L; Jackson R; Wells S; Kenealy T Ann Fam Med; 2008; 6(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 18474883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Framing as a Concept for Health Communication: A Systematic Review. Guenther L; Gaertner M; Zeitz J Health Commun; 2021 Jun; 36(7):891-899. PubMed ID: 31996044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Health numeracy and understanding of risk among older American Indians and Alaska Natives. LaVallie DL; Wolf FM; Jacobsen C; Sprague D; Buchwald DS J Health Commun; 2012; 17(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 22188207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]