These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20737569)

  • 21. Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.
    Le QT; Fu KK; Kaplan M; Terris DJ; Fee WE; Goffinet DR
    Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1700-11. PubMed ID: 10547542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of the proposals of the international association for the study of lung cancer in the forthcoming edition of lung cancer staging system to predict long-term prognosis of operated patients.
    Rena O; Massera F; Robustellini M; Papalia E; Delfanti R; Lisi E; Pirondini E; Turello D; Casadio C
    Cancer J; 2010; 16(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 20404615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcome indicators of stage II gastric cancer according to the Japanese classification of gastric cancer.
    Ojima H; Araki K; Kato T; Okamura K; Manda R; Hirayama I; Hosouchi Y; Nishida Y; Kuwano H
    Anticancer Res; 2006; 26(2B):1385-90. PubMed ID: 16619548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison the sixth and seventh editions of the AJCC staging system for T1 gastric cancer: a long-term follow-up study of 2124 patients.
    Choi KH; Kim BS; Oh ST; Yook JH; Kim BS
    Gastric Cancer; 2017 Jan; 20(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 26732877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on cancer tumor node-staging system in patients with colorectal carcinoma in comparison with sixth classification.
    Park JS; Choi GS; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y; Huh JW; Kim HR; Kwak SG
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 106(6):674-9. PubMed ID: 22514036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the UICC/AJCC 1992 and 1997 pN categories for gastric cancer patients after surgery.
    Wu CW; Hsieh MC; Lo SS; Shen KH; Lui WY; P'eng FK
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2001; 48(37):279-84. PubMed ID: 11268985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.
    Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T
    Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The superiority of the new International Union Against Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging of gastric carcinoma.
    Hermanek P
    Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1763-5. PubMed ID: 10760749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The new TNM classification and staging of stomach cancer].
    Hermanek P
    Leber Magen Darm; 1989 Jul; 19(4):169-72, 175-9. PubMed ID: 2677567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The Comparison between 6th and 7th International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Survival Prognosis of Gastric Cancer].
    Kim SS; Choi BY; Seo SI; Jung MY; Choi HS; Ahn SM; Choi WH; Kim HS; Kim KH; Jang MK; Lee JH; Kim HY; Shin WG
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2011 Nov; 58(5):258-63. PubMed ID: 22113042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.
    Jun KH; Lee JS; Kim JH; Kim JJ; Chin HM; Park SM
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):893-6. PubMed ID: 25026311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The clinical significance of the histological classification of stomach cancer after Laurén].
    Iarv VR; Saar KhE; Villako KP
    Vopr Onkol; 1991; 37(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 2014679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
    Asoglu O; Karanlik H; Parlak M; Kecer M; Muslumanoglu M; Igci A; Ozmen V; Gulluoglu M; Kapran Y
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(91-92):908-13. PubMed ID: 19621727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer?
    Huang B; Zheng X; Wang Z; Wang M; Dong Y; Zhao B; Xu H
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18998065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The study of the minimum number of examined lymph nodes for the TNM classification of gastric cancer].
    Chen B; Sun JY; Jin F; Xu HM; Wang SB
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 43(11):702-5. PubMed ID: 16008956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in T3 gastric cancer.
    Hyung WJ; Noh SH; Yoo CH; Huh JH; Shin DW; Lah KH; Lee JH; Choi SH; Min JS
    World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 11865369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How does the number of resected lymph nodes influence TNM staging and prognosis for esophageal carcinoma?
    Hu Y; Hu C; Zhang H; Ping Y; Chen LQ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 19953333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cohort study based on the seventh edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: proposal of a new staging system.
    Warneke VS; Behrens HM; Hartmann JT; Held H; Becker T; Schwarz NT; Röcken C
    J Clin Oncol; 2011 Jun; 29(17):2364-71. PubMed ID: 21537040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma.
    Hayashi H; Ochiai T; Suzuki T; Shimada H; Hori S; Takeda A; Miyazawa Y
    Surgery; 2000 Feb; 127(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 10686976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Re-evaluation of 6th edition of AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and proposed improvement based on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Mao YP; Xie FY; Liu LZ; Sun Y; Li L; Tang LL; Liao XB; Xu HY; Chen L; Lai SZ; Lin AH; Liu MZ; Ma J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1326-34. PubMed ID: 19153016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.