These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20737585)

  • 21. Effects of the initial temperature of acrylic bone cement liquid monomer on the properties of the stem-cement interface and cement polymerization.
    Iesaka K; Jaffe WL; Kummer FJ
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2004 Feb; 68(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 14737767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of stem preheating on the fatigue behaviour of bone cement around hip prostheses.
    Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Baleani M; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):637-41. PubMed ID: 19623915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the shrinkage of commercial bone cements when mixed under vacuum.
    Kwong FN; Power RA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):120-2. PubMed ID: 16365134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Vacuum mixing systems for bone cement completion - comparison of different systems].
    Horas U; Seidel P; Heiss C; Kilian O; Dingeldein E; Schnettler R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002; 140(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 12476381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement.
    Geiger MH; Keating EM; Ritter MA; Ginther JA; Faris PM; Meding JB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Jan; (382):258-66. PubMed ID: 11153996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The apparent fracture toughness of acrylic bone cement: effect of three variables.
    Lewis G; Nyman J; Trieu HH
    Biomaterials; 1998 May; 19(10):961-7. PubMed ID: 9690838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Why would cement porosity reduction be clinically irrelevant, while experimental data show the contrary.
    Janssen D; Stolk J; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jul; 23(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 16022978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The dynamic volume changes of polymerising polymethyl methacrylate bone cement.
    Muller SD; Green SM; McCaskie AW
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 12553519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Properties of an injectable low modulus PMMA bone cement for osteoporotic bone.
    Boger A; Bohner M; Heini P; Verrier S; Schneider E
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Aug; 86(2):474-82. PubMed ID: 18288697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implications of ageing effects on thermal and mechanical properties of PMMA-based bone cement for THA revision surgery.
    Reulbach M; Evers P; Emonde C; Behnsen H; Nürnberger F; Windhagen H; Jakubowitz E
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106218. PubMed ID: 37931550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of Different Experience Levels of Orthopaedic Residents Effect on Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement Mechanical Properties.
    Struemph JM; Chong AC; Wooley PH
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():193-8. PubMed ID: 26361465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Statistical distribution of the fatigue strength of porous bone cement.
    Hoey DA; Taylor D
    Biomaterials; 2009 Oct; 30(31):6309-17. PubMed ID: 19699519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of mixing method and storage temperature of cement constituents on the fatigue and porosity of acrylic bone cement.
    Lewis G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 10331907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of Porosity on Fracture Toughness and Fracture Behavior of Antibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement.
    Kim S; Baril C; Rudraraju S; Ploeg HL
    J Biomech Eng; 2022 Jan; 144(1):. PubMed ID: 34286825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ries MD; Young E; Al-Marashi L; Goldstein P; Hetherington A; Petrie T; Pruitt L
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 16039712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A new method to optimize the adhesion between bone cement and acetabular bone in total hip arthroplasty].
    Wirtz DC; Lelgemann B; Jungwirth F; Niethard FU; Marx R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12695959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences in bone-cement porosity by vacuum mixing, centrifugation, and hand mixing.
    Macaulay W; DiGiovanni CW; Restrepo A; Saleh KJ; Walsh H; Crossett LS; Peterson MG; Li S; Salvati EA
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Aug; 17(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 12168171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Static shear strength between polished stem and seven commercial acrylic bone cements.
    Zhang H; Brown L; Blunt L
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 Feb; 19(2):591-9. PubMed ID: 17619954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Thermally induced strains and total shrinkage of the polymethyl-methacrylate cement in simplified models of total hip arthroplasty.
    Griza S; Ueki MM; Souza DH; Cervieri A; Strohaecker TR
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Feb; 18():29-36. PubMed ID: 23237878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do we need to vacuum mix or centrifuge cement?
    Wixson RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):84-90. PubMed ID: 1446459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.