400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20739439)
1. The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.
Arellano Mde J
Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 20739439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Female genital mutilation or cutting: an updated medico-legal analysis.
Mathews B; Dallaston E
Med J Aust; 2020 Oct; 213(7):309-311.e1. PubMed ID: 32924148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion and human rights.
Shaw D
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):633-46. PubMed ID: 20303830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unethical female stereotyping in reproductive health.
Cook RJ; Cusack S; Dickens BM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Jun; 109(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 20206355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conscientious objection to the provision of reproductive healthcare.
Chavkin W
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 123 Suppl 3():S39-40. PubMed ID: 24332233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human rights advances in women's reproductive health in Africa.
Ngwena CG; Brookman-Amissah E; Skuster P
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 May; 129(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 25712778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AMWA position statement on abortion and reproductive rights.
Devi G; Glodowski M; Shin E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Mar; 18(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 19281313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope!
Johari V; Jadhav U
Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):180-183. PubMed ID: 28279947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
Siano JR
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
Reilly EA
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
Cherry AL
Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Degendering reproduction?
Jackson E
Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(3):346-68. PubMed ID: 18695265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights.
Schehr AR
Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The denial of abortion care information, referrals, and services undermines quality care for U.S. women.
Weitz TA; Fogel SB
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20123171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
Smith PA
Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's right to health and Ireland's abortion laws.
Taylor M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jul; 130(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 25939525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's rights in Stalinist Hungary: the abortion trials of 1952-53.
Peto A; Kossuth E
Hung Stud Rev; 2002; 29(1-2):49-76. PubMed ID: 17233136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Conflicts between protecting and respecting women: the prohibition of sex-selected birth.
Dickens BM
Hum Health Care Int; 1997; 13(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 16729411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The African Women's Protocol: bringing attention to reproductive rights and the MDGs.
Gerntholtz L; Gibbs A; Willan S
PLoS Med; 2011 Apr; 8(4):e1000429. PubMed ID: 21483715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]