BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2074418)

  • 1. Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals.
    Campos JM; del Rio C
    J Endod; 1990 May; 16(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 2074418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
    Cheung GS; Chan AW
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation.
    Hülsmann M; Stryga F
    J Endod; 1993 Mar; 19(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.
    Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remaining dentin/cementum thickness after hand or ultrasonic instrumentation.
    McCann JT; Keller DL; LaBounty GL
    J Endod; 1990 Mar; 16(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 2388025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after "one-visit" endodontic treatment.
    Nair PN; Henry S; Cano V; Vera J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Feb; 99(2):231-52. PubMed ID: 15660098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of root canals configuration in mandibular first permanent molar.
    Goel NK; Gill KS; Taneja JR
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1991 Mar; 8(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 2056340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transportation of curved canals instrumented with manual and mechanical techniques.
    Leonardi LE; Atlas DM; Raiden G
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16302456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison using macroradiography of canal shapes in teeth instrumented ultrasonically and by hand.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
    J Endod; 1989 Aug; 15(8):339-44. PubMed ID: 2637324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
    Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring.
    Isom TL; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1995 Jul; 21(7):368-71. PubMed ID: 7499977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
    Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
    Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
    Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1989 Feb; 15(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2607269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Frequency and most common localisation of root canal curvature].
    Blasković-Subat V
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1991; 25(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 1819932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
    Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of a brush in removing postinstrumentation canal debris.
    Keir DM; Senia ES; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1990 Jul; 16(7):323-7. PubMed ID: 2081946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The risk of furcal perforation in mandibular molars using Gates-Glidden drills with anticurvature pressure.
    Wu MK; van der Sluis LW; Wesselink PR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 15716849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
    Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
    J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.