These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2074426)

  • 1. Scanning electron microscope observation of canal cleanliness.
    Mandel E; Machtou P; Friedman S
    J Endod; 1990 Jun; 16(6):279-83. PubMed ID: 2074426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different endodontic procedures on dentin morphology of human teeth.
    Prati C; Selighini M; Ferrieri P; Mongiorgi R
    J Endod; 1994 Apr; 20(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 8035157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of the Nd:YAP laser. Effect on canal cleanliness.
    Blum JY; Abadie MJ
    J Endod; 1997 Nov; 23(11):669-75. PubMed ID: 9587305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system.
    Lussi A; Nussbächer U; Grosrey J
    J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):549-53. PubMed ID: 8151242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Preparation of curved root canals using hand instruments and mechanical aids].
    Hülsmann M; Bertzbach F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 2630269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ultrastructural study of the smear layer: comparative aspects using secondary electron image and backscattered electron image.
    Dautel-Morazin A; Vulcain JM; Bonnaure-Mallet M
    J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):531-4. PubMed ID: 7643035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
    Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
    J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of Er:YAG laser irradiation in removing debris and smear layer on root canal walls.
    Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K
    J Endod; 1998 Aug; 24(8):548-51. PubMed ID: 9759018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic debridement comparing sodium hypochlorite and water.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 1919404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of cutting efficiency of hand, gyromatic and path-finder root canal instruments. A scanning electron microscope study.
    Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8180277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) study of the smear layer in root canals.
    Tanboğa I; Kuraner T
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1990 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 2129919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
    Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.