98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2074426)
1. Scanning electron microscope observation of canal cleanliness.
Mandel E; Machtou P; Friedman S
J Endod; 1990 Jun; 16(6):279-83. PubMed ID: 2074426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different endodontic procedures on dentin morphology of human teeth.
Prati C; Selighini M; Ferrieri P; Mongiorgi R
J Endod; 1994 Apr; 20(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 8035157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study of the Nd:YAP laser. Effect on canal cleanliness.
Blum JY; Abadie MJ
J Endod; 1997 Nov; 23(11):669-75. PubMed ID: 9587305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system.
Lussi A; Nussbächer U; Grosrey J
J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):549-53. PubMed ID: 8151242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Preparation of curved root canals using hand instruments and mechanical aids].
Hülsmann M; Bertzbach F
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 2630269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An ultrastructural study of the smear layer: comparative aspects using secondary electron image and backscattered electron image.
Dautel-Morazin A; Vulcain JM; Bonnaure-Mallet M
J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):531-4. PubMed ID: 7643035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of Er:YAG laser irradiation in removing debris and smear layer on root canal walls.
Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K
J Endod; 1998 Aug; 24(8):548-51. PubMed ID: 9759018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic debridement comparing sodium hypochlorite and water.
Walker TL; del Rio CE
J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 1919404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of cutting efficiency of hand, gyromatic and path-finder root canal instruments. A scanning electron microscope study.
Shah N
Indian J Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8180277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) study of the smear layer in root canals.
Tanboğa I; Kuraner T
J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1990 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 2129919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
