These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2074592)

  • 1. Technique for mounting computer-generated models for subperiosteal implants: the Brookdate tube and Stylus Centric System.
    Cranin AN; Klein M; Sirakian A
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 2074592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of stereolithography to subperiosteal implant manufacture.
    McAllister ML
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 9835835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CAD/CAM subperiosteal implants in Australia. Case report.
    Fischer JE
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Aug; 38(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 8110228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro comparison of the computerized tomography/CAD-CAM and direct bone impression techniques for subperiosteal implant model generation.
    Cranin AN; Klein M; Ley JP; Andrews J; DiGregorio R
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 9835833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Customised instrument to retract alveolar subperiosteal flap during the placement of dental implants: new technique.
    Vadepally AK
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 55(8):855-856. PubMed ID: 28844571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subperiosteal implants provide another option for dentistry: one practitioner's experience.
    O'Roark WL
    MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 9569874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer tomography (CT) applications in implant dentistry.
    James RA; Lozada JL; Truitt HP
    J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 1942127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hinged tripodal subperiosteal implants for severely atrophied mandibles.
    Linkow LI
    Dent Today; 1996 Apr; 15(4):70, 72-3. PubMed ID: 9567858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of CT generated model with its mandibular and maxillary bone; 2: In vivo study utilizing rasterstereographic technique.
    Harris DD; Ismail YH; Misch C; Zaki HS
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1989; 6(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2519534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Use of subperiosteal implants for rehabilitation of patients with marked atrophy of bone tissue of the jaws].
    Amkhadova MA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2004; 83(3):72-4. PubMed ID: 15252897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of subperiosteal implants with distal filling ports in the correction of the atrophic alveolar ridge.
    Lew D; Hinkle RM; Collins SF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Feb; 20(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 2019776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-tubular bi-sectional interlocking maxillary subperiosteal implants.
    Linkow LI; Abele TH; Barfield DJ; Grantham GP
    J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 1942130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [General concepts on the possibilities offered today by subperiosteal implantology].
    Puente de Blas AS; Leclercq P
    Rev Fr Prothes Dent; 1989 Jan; (1):25-34. PubMed ID: 2698490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival of a subperiosteal tantalum mesh from 1955 to 2004.
    Cortese G
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 44(1):71. PubMed ID: 15935524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The new-generation subperiosteal implant.
    Clarke JH
    J Gt Houst Dent Soc; 1992 Oct; 64(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 1288576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted dental implant surgery using computed tomography.
    Fortin T; Coudert JL; Champleboux G; Sautot P; Lavallée S
    J Image Guid Surg; 1995; 1(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 9079427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Select uses of the subperiosteal implant.
    Benjamin LS
    Dent Implantol Update; 1994 Feb; 5(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 7919412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From subperiosteal to osseointegration: an unusual demand met by an unusual approach.
    Ganz CH
    Dent Today; 1995 Oct; 14(10):48, 50-1. PubMed ID: 9540645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new technique for the old subperiosteal implant.
    Harris BW
    Dent Implantol Update; 1992 Feb; 3(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 1364305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A maxillary subperiosteal implant design that maximizes bone support and accomodates a cemented, low-profile parallel guiding planes Hader bar.
    Nordquist WD; Naisbitt D
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 8699523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.