120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2074593)
1. Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution.
Matsushita Y; Kitoh M; Mizuta K; Ikeda H; Suetsugu T
J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 2074593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):401-12. PubMed ID: 15248874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Petrie CS; Williams JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 16117775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Load transfer by fine threading the implant neck--a FEM study.
Rahimi A; Bourauel C; Jager A; Gedrange T; Heinemann F
J Physiol Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 60 Suppl 8():107-12. PubMed ID: 20400802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material and the bone height.
Hedia HS
Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 12122235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of a hydroxyapatite-reinforced polyethylene stress distributor in a dental implant on compressive stress levels in surrounding bone.
Abu-Hammad OA; Harrison A; Williams D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 10960990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of implant length and diameter prior to and after osseointegration: a 2-D finite element analysis.
Georgiopoulos B; Kalioras K; Provatidis C; Manda M; Koidis P
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(5):243-56. PubMed ID: 17987856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.
Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
