120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2074593)
21. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant.
Clelland NL; Ismail YH; Zaki HS; Pipko D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 1820307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Hsu ML; Chen FC; Kao HC; Cheng CK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17465356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
Petrie CS; Williams JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.
Anitua E; Tapia R; Luzuriaga F; Orive G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Feb; 30(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 20224835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Li T; Kong L; Wang Y; Hu K; Song L; Liu B; Li D; Shao J; Ding Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 38(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 19656657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pilot-hole preparation for proper implant positioning and the enhancement of bone formation.
Horiuchi M; Ichikawa T; Kanitani HWigianto R; Kawamoto N; Matsumoto N
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8699525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis.
Canay S; Hersek N; Akpinar I; Aşik Z
Quintessence Int; 1996 Sep; 27(9):591-8. PubMed ID: 9180415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of cancellous bone on the functionally graded dental implant concept.
Hedia HS
Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 15912000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis.
Wang TM; Leu LJ; Wang J; Lin LD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11958406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants.
Steflik DE; Noel C; McBrayer C; Lake FT; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 8699510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part I.
Gross MD; Nissan J; Samuel R
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 11357069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of compromised cortical bone on implant load distribution.
Akça K; Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):616-20. PubMed ID: 18798784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: a finite element analysis.
Vaillancourt H; Pilliar RM; McCammond D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 8752556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Two-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of bridge design on stress distribution in bone tissues surrounding fixtures of osseointegrated implants in the lower molar region.
Arataki T; Adachi Y; Kishi M
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Aug; 39(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 9927906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
