120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2074593)
41. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
Sertgöz A
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Anchorage effects of a palatal osseointegrated implant with different fixation: a finite element study.
Chen F; Terada K; Hanada K; Saito I
Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):593-601. PubMed ID: 16097228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Mechanical response to functional loading around the threads of retromolar endosseous implants utilized for orthodontic anchorage: coordinated histomorphometric and finite element analysis.
Chen J; Esterle M; Roberts WE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 10212547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Bone resorption at the entry of osseointegrated implants--a biomechanical phenomenon. Finite element study].
Mailath G; Stoiber B; Watzek G; Matejka M
Z Stomatol; 1989 Jun; 86(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 2638071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Stegaroiu R; Sato T; Kusakari H; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 9509784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible.
Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 7916894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of macro-design of immediately loaded implants on micromotion and stress distribution in surrounding bone using finite element analysis.
Fazel A; Aalai S; Rismanchian M
Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 19667823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Combined influence of implant diameter and alveolar ridge width on crestal bone stress: a quantitative approach.
Yu W; Jang YJ; Kyung HM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 19344030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Apr; 32(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 15790383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface.
Canay S; Akça K
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Analysis of bone-implant stress distribution. Finite element modeling].
Valentin I; Taieb A; Benhaim L; Franquin JC; Houri A
Cah Prothese; 1990 Dec; (72):142-53. PubMed ID: 2268785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Three-dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants.
Kohal RJ; Papavasiliou G; Kamposiora P; Tripodakis A; Strub JR
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 11951811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Tu MG; Shen YW; Wu CL
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18321264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Stress analysis of different angulations of implant installation: the finite element method.
Lan TH; Huang HL; Wu JH; Lee HE; Wang CH
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Mar; 24(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 18364274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Role of the finite element model in dental implants.
DeTolla DH; Andreana S; Patra A; Buhite R; Comella B
J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 11831334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
