These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2075638)

  • 1. [Chlamydia. Systematic screening is desirable for those less than 24 years old].
    Charbonneau L
    Union Med Can; 1990; 119(6):343-4, 346-9. PubMed ID: 2075638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Snaring a silent threat. Chlamydia declining thanks to screening and prevention.
    Hobus P
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2002 Oct; 10(10):63-6. PubMed ID: 12424886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Adolescents and chlamydia: cervix microbiology among adolescents; the first statistics of the family planning centers according to the Calmat law].
    Henry-Suchet J
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1995 May; 23(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 7613578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Systematic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis with the molecular biological AMP-CT test in urine samples from young women].
    Orfila J; Mention JE; Sueur JM; Chaigneau C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):555-7. PubMed ID: 12407326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: which group should be targeted and at what price?].
    van Vloten WA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):652-3. PubMed ID: 10321294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of a urine-based jail screening program to citywide male Chlamydia and gonorrhea case rates in New York City.
    Pathela P; Hennessy RR; Blank S; Parvez F; Franklin W; Schillinger JA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 17989586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population in Amsterdam. III. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women and the role of reinfection and partner treatment].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; Jager JC; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Nov; 143(47):2383-5. PubMed ID: 10590778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Chlamydia. Time for screening of sexually active young people?].
    Petersen CS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Aug; 163(34):4530. PubMed ID: 11530551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chlamydia screening recommendations.
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2001 Jul; 15(7):403. PubMed ID: 11526903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chlamydia trachomatis.
    McSherry J
    Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Apr; 45(393):219-20. PubMed ID: 7612331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Potentials of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Hungary: cost-benefit analysis].
    Nyári T; Mészáros G; Deák J; Nagy E; Kovács L
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(27):1511-6. PubMed ID: 10943109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Ruitenberg EN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May; 143(19):1012. PubMed ID: 10368724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High cost of Chlamydia can be cut, researcher finds.
    Silversides A
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1119. PubMed ID: 10234330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commentary: Chlamydia trachomatis screening: what are we trying to do?
    Peterman TA; Gottlieb SL; Berman SM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 38(2):449-51. PubMed ID: 19174542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Focus on Chlamydia.
    Low N; Ward H
    Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jul; 83(4):251-2. PubMed ID: 17664356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Screening for chlamydia among sexually active young people].
    Østergaard LJ; Gutschik E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):162-4. PubMed ID: 11831079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving participation in Chlamydia screening programs: perspectives of high-risk youth.
    Blake DR; Kearney MH; Oakes JM; Druker SK; Bibace R
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2003 Jun; 157(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 12796231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections--United States, 1995.
    Can Commun Dis Rep; 1998 Jan; 24(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9494223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The Dutch Health Council report on screening for Chlamydia: too reserved].
    Dekker JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(16):850-2. PubMed ID: 15868986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
    Blake DR; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.