These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2076141)
1. [The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986]. Cruz ML Bol Asoc Med P R; 1990 Nov; 82(11):501-4. PubMed ID: 2076141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches? Donovan RE J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months. Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New peer review law provides immunity with obligations. Valiant C Physician Exec; 1987; 13(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10312139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: an overview of its immunity provisions. Miles JJ Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 10284641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. National Data Bank to revolutionize peer review reporting. Lockhart L; Poe K; Wilcox DP Natl Med Leg J; 1990; 1(2):1, 8-9. PubMed ID: 2088551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits. Purtell DL Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: its history, provisions, applications and implications. Horner SL Am J Law Med; 1990; 16(4):455-98. PubMed ID: 2102058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: reporting practitioner malpractice and discipline. McNair RM Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):10-8. PubMed ID: 10284642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 1986 Quality Improvement Act: a step in the right direction. Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1987 Jun; 68(5):22, 24. PubMed ID: 10282290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Pugsley SC Leg Med; 1990; ():217-42. PubMed ID: 2130197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncertainty and unpredictability in application of peer review privileges statutes. Hicks JT J Health Hosp Law; 1991 May; 24(5):137-43, 167. PubMed ID: 10110682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality control in health care: developments in the law of medical malpractice. Furrow BR Leg Med; 1994; ():83-131. PubMed ID: 7830487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job. Oliverio J Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Fogel PD; Phillips EJ J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change? Scheutzow SO Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The National Practitioner Data Bank: coping with the uncertainties. Lovitky JA J Health Law; 2000; 33(2):355-79. PubMed ID: 11010448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Pugsley SC J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Feb; 23(2):42-52. PubMed ID: 10106379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Austin v. McNamara: immunity from suit under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(4):49-51. PubMed ID: 10107512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]