BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2076630)

  • 1. A comparison of user accuracy, techniques, and learning time of various systems for self blood glucose monitoring.
    Tomky DM; Clarke DH
    Diabetes Educ; 1990; 16(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 2076630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic.
    Thomas LE; Kane MP; Bakst G; Busch RS; Hamilton RA; Abelseth JM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 18260773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [ExacTech--a new measuring system for personal control of blood glucose].
    Regal H; Zdolsek I; Bali C; Irsigler K
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Jul; 139(14):337-9. PubMed ID: 2773491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Accu-Chek Mobile blood glucose monitoring system used under controlled conditions meets ISO 15197 standards in the hands of diabetes patients.
    Sachse D; Bolstad N; Jonsson M; Sæves I; Johansson CB; Delezuch W; Hagve M; Hardang IM; Isaksson HS; Ivarsson A; Lehto L; Keikkala E; Mattsson N; Ranta JK; Stavelin A; Sudmann AA; Varsi K
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2012 Sep; 72(5):374-9. PubMed ID: 22900743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. System Accuracy Evaluation of Four Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Following ISO 15197 Using a Glucose Oxidase and a Hexokinase-Based Comparison Method.
    Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Rittmeyer D; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 9(5):1041-50. PubMed ID: 25872967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Current portable blood sugar analysis equipment--comparison of the MediSense Card, Glucometer Elite, Hypocount Supreme and Omnican Control with the glucose oxidase reference method].
    Weitgasser R; Gappmayer B
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1997 Jan; 127(1-2):12-7. PubMed ID: 9036524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.
    Pfützner A; Mitri M; Musholt PB; Sachsenheimer D; Borchert M; Yap A; Forst T
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Apr; 28(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 22435798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comprehensive evaluation of strip performance in multiple blood glucose monitoring systems.
    Katz LB; Macleod K; Grady M; Cameron H; Pfützner A; Setford S
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015 May; 12(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 25702769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Testing: Post-Market Performance Assessment of the Accu-Chek Inform II Hospital-Use Glucose Meter].
    Petryaykina EE; Mayanskiy NA; Demina ES; Karamysheva IV; Gorst KA; Timofeev AV
    Ter Arkh; 2023 Dec; 95(12):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 38785055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and precision of glucose monitoring are relevant to treatment decision-making and clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with diabetes.
    Voulgari C; Tentolouris N
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Jul; 13(7):723-30. PubMed ID: 21699417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 28225633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of three blood glucose meters.
    Rheney CC; Kirk JK
    Ann Pharmacother; 2000 Mar; 34(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 10917376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. System Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of an Improved System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Liebing C; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 12(2):407-411. PubMed ID: 29291625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems.
    Kuo CY; Hsu CT; Ho CS; Su TE; Wu MH; Wang CJ
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 May; 13(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 21406013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using blood glucose meters. Minimizing errors, maximizing accuracy.
    Health Devices; 2004 Jul; 33(7):251-6. PubMed ID: 15446370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the effects of insufficient blood volume samples on the performance of blood glucose self-test meters.
    Pfützner A; Schipper C; Ramljak S; Flacke F; Sieber J; Forst T; Musholt PB
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1522-9. PubMed ID: 24351178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: proposed guidelines to improve accuracy.
    Bergenstal R; Pearson J; Cembrowski GS; Bina D; Davidson J; List S
    Diabetes Educ; 2000; 26(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 11912810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the accuracy of glucose reflectance meters in pregnant insulin-dependent diabetics.
    Harkness LJ; Ashwood ER; Parsons S; Lenke RR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Feb; 77(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 1988877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical performance and ease of use of a blood glucose meter that uses a 10-test disk.
    Garg SK; Carter JA; Mullen L; Folker AC; Parkes JL; Tideman AM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2004 Aug; 6(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 15321005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of first-generation and second-generation blood glucose meters for use in a hospital setting.
    Meehan CD; Bove LA; Jennings AS
    Diabetes Educ; 1992; 18(3):228-31. PubMed ID: 1451624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.