These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2076973)

  • 1. Interaction of cisplatin and noise on the peripheral auditory system.
    Gratton MA; Salvi RJ; Kamen BA; Saunders SS
    Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):211-23. PubMed ID: 2076973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Candidate's thesis: enhancing intrinsic cochlear stress defenses to reduce noise-induced hearing loss.
    Kopke RD; Coleman JK; Liu J; Campbell KC; Riffenburgh RH
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1515-32. PubMed ID: 12352659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact noise and the equal energy hypothesis.
    Roberto M; Hamernik RP; Salvi RJ; Henderson D; Milone R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1514-20. PubMed ID: 3989106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of infrasound on cochlear damage from exposure to a 4 kHz octave band of noise.
    Harding GW; Bohne BA; Lee SC; Salt AN
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):128-38. PubMed ID: 17300889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of acoustic trauma on the tectorial membrane, stereocilia, and hearing sensitivity: possible mechanisms underlying damage, recovery, and protection.
    Canlon B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1988; 27():1-45. PubMed ID: 3043645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of noise and salicylate on auditory evoked-response thresholds in the chinchilla.
    Bancroft BR; Boettcher FA; Salvi RJ; Wu J
    Hear Res; 1991 Jul; 54(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 1917714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact noise: the importance of level, duration, and repetition rate.
    Henderson D; Subramaniam M; Gratton MA; Saunders SS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1350-7. PubMed ID: 2030222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of the kurtosis statistic in evaluating complex noise exposures for the protection of hearing.
    Davis RI; Qiu W; Hamernik RP
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 19657275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of the amplitude distribution of equal energy exposures on noise-induced hearing loss: the kurtosis metric.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):386-95. PubMed ID: 12880050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threshold shift, hair cell loss, and hair bundle stiffness following exposure to 120 and 125 dB pure tones in the neonatal chick.
    Adler HJ; Kenealy JF; Dedio RM; Saunders JC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 1441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduction of noise-induced hearing loss using L-NAC and salicylate in the chinchilla.
    Kopke RD; Weisskopf PA; Boone JL; Jackson RL; Wester DC; Hoffer ME; Lambert DC; Charon CC; Ding DL; McBride D
    Hear Res; 2000 Nov; 149(1-2):138-46. PubMed ID: 11033253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potentiation of kanamycin ototoxicity by a history of noise exposure.
    Ryan AF; Bone RC
    Otolaryngology; 1978; 86(1):ORL-125-8. PubMed ID: 114911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing thresholds.
    Hamernik RP; Patterson JH; Turrentine GA; Ahroon WA
    Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 2708163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discharge patterns in the cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla following noise induced asymptotic threshold shift.
    Salvi RJ; Hamernik RP; Henderson D
    Exp Brain Res; 1978 Jul; 32(3):301-20. PubMed ID: 680046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of vibration on asymptotic threshold shift produced by impulse noise.
    Hamernik RP; Henderson D; Coling D; Salvi R
    Audiology; 1981; 20(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 7213211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of low-frequency "conditioning" on hearing loss from high-frequency exposure.
    Subramaniam M; Henderson D; Spongr V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):952-6. PubMed ID: 8445129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of interrupted noise exposures on the noise-damaged cochlea.
    Ahroon WA; Hamernik RP
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):103-9. PubMed ID: 10771187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of acoustic environment after traumatic noise exposure on hearing and outer hair cells.
    Tanaka C; Chen GD; Hu BH; Chi LH; Li M; Zheng G; Bielefeld EC; Jamesdaniel S; Coling D; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 250(1-2):10-8. PubMed ID: 19450428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying Gaussian noise exposures: the applicability of the equal energy hypothesis.
    Qiu W; Davis B; Hamernik RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1613-20. PubMed ID: 17407898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interaction of whole body vibration and impulse noise.
    Hamernik RP; Henderson D; Coling D; Slepecky N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):928-34. PubMed ID: 7358917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.