BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2077497)

  • 1. Dose-responsive characteristics of meperidine sedation in preschool children.
    McKee KC; Nazif MM; Jackson DL; Barnhart DC; Close J; Moore PA
    Pediatr Dent; 1990; 12(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 2077497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of morphine as compared to meperidine when administered to the moderately anxious pediatric dental patient.
    Roberts SM; Wilson CF; Seale NS; McWhorter AG
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 1303534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oral midazolam with and without meperidine for management of the difficult young pediatric dental patient: a retrospective study.
    Nathan JE; Vargas KG
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11991315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conscious sedation and pulse oximetry: false alarms?
    Wilson S
    Pediatr Dent; 1990; 12(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 2077498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microstream capnography improves patient monitoring during moderate sedation: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Lightdale JR; Goldmann DA; Feldman HA; Newburg AR; DiNardo JA; Fox VL
    Pediatrics; 2006 Jun; 117(6):e1170-8. PubMed ID: 16702250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two meperidine/hydroxyzine sedation regimens for the uncooperative pediatric dental patient.
    Cathers JW; Wilson CF; Webb MD; Alvarez ME; Schiffman T; Taylor S
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 16435640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between bispectral analysis and level of conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients.
    Religa ZC; Wilson S; Ganzberg SI; Casamassimo PS
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 12064495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An assessment of the success of meperidine and promethazine sedation in medically compromised children.
    Haney KL; McWhorter AG; Seale NS
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):288-94. PubMed ID: 8258571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intravenous sedation in pediatric dentistry using midazolam, nalbuphine and droperidol.
    Milnes AR; Maupomé G; Cannon J
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 10769855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients.
    Chowdhury J; Vargas KG
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16173222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A retrospective study of chloral hydrate, meperidine, hydroxyzine, and midazolam regimens used to sedate children for dental care.
    Wilson S; Easton J; Lamb K; Orchardson R; Casamassimo P
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10769854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients using chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine, and nitrous oxide--a retrospective study of 382 sedations.
    Needleman HL; Joshi A; Griffith DG
    Pediatr Dent; 1995; 17(7):424-31. PubMed ID: 8786908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of two doses of intranasal midazolam for sedation of young pediatric dental patients.
    Fuks AB; Kaufman E; Ram D; Hovav S; Shapira J
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 7937264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral assessments of two drug combinations for oral sedation.
    Sams DR; Cook EW; Jackson JG; Roebuck BL
    Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 8378156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors associated with administration route when using midazolam for pediatric conscious sedation.
    Primosch RE; Bender F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(4):233-8, 228. PubMed ID: 11862873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of midazolam to meperidine/promethazine as an IM sedative technique for the pediatric dental patient.
    Downs AT; Dembo J; Ferretti G; Lyons TD; Pelphery A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(3):197-200, 165, 228. PubMed ID: 9262801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electromyography: its potential as an adjunct to other monitored parameters during conscious sedation in children receiving dental treatment.
    Wilson S; Tafaro ST; Vieth RF
    Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 2077979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of oral midazolam with and without hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients.
    Shapira J; Kupietzky A; Kadari A; Fuks AB; Holan G
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):492-6. PubMed ID: 15646910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination with and without meperidine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients.
    Poorman TL; Farrington FH; Mourino AP
    Pediatr Dent; 1990; 12(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 2095539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of oral chloral hydrate with intramuscular ketamine, meperidine, and promethazine for pediatric sedation--preliminary report.
    Campbell RL; Ross GA; Campbell JR; Mourino AP
    Anesth Prog; 1998; 45(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 10356431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.