BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2077835)

  • 1. [Uterine, adnexal and cul-de-sac masses. Comparative study by intravaginal and trans-abdominal echography].
    Costa A; de Andrade FS
    Acta Med Port; 1990; 3(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 2077835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transvaginal sonography of adnexal masses.
    Coleman BG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jul; 30(4):677-91. PubMed ID: 1631277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adnexal and cul-de-sac abnormalities: transvaginal sonography.
    Lande IM; Hill MC; Cosco FE; Kator NN
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 3275977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pictorial essay: transabdominal and endovaginal sonography of adnexal masses.
    Jain KA; Jeffrey RB
    Clin Imaging; 1991; 15(4):245-52. PubMed ID: 1742672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subserous uterine adenomyosis mimicking an adnexal mass on sonography.
    La Fianza A; Abbati D; Cesari S; Morbini P
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2004 Feb; 32(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 14750142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transabdominal and transvaginal sonography of pelvic masses.
    Fleischer AC; Gordon AN; Entman SS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 2678656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Pelvic masses in childhood: ultrasonographic imaging].
    Kis E; Verebély T; Máttyus I; Rényi I
    Orv Hetil; 1991 Nov; 132(47):2609-12. PubMed ID: 1956684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Doppler with two-dimensional sonography and CA 125 for prediction of malignancy of pelvic masses.
    Schneider VL; Schneider A; Reed KL; Hatch KD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):983-8. PubMed ID: 8497367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of image parameters of pelvic adnexal masses in tele-echography].
    Gonçalves Fda S; Vaz-Oliani DC; de Oliveira GH; Oliani AH
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 35(10):464-8. PubMed ID: 24337059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transvaginal color duplex sonography: clinical potentials and limitations.
    Fleischer AC; Kepple DM
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1992 Feb; 13(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 1562351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
    Salem S; White LM; Lai J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantage of transvaginal over transabdominal sonography.
    Pataki K; Jakab Z; Harkányi Z; Vigváry Z
    Acta Chir Hung; 1991; 32(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 1785220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of the retrodisplaced uterus.
    Lamki N; Athey P; Dunn G; Watson AB
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1990 Oct; 41(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 2207791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Method of recording and study of functional changes in serial hysterosalpingography].
    Sanpiter IA; Bunin AT
    Sov Med; 1976 Jun; (6):145-6. PubMed ID: 1035438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: differences in blood flow impedance in benign and malignant lesions.
    Hamper UM; Sheth S; Abbas FM; Rosenshein NB; Aronson D; Kurman RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1225-8. PubMed ID: 8498222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How accurate is the pelvic examination as compared to transvaginal sonography? A prospective, comparative study.
    Carter J; Fowler J; Carson L; Carlson J; Twiggs LB
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8169913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Satoskar P; Deshpande A
    J Postgrad Med; 1991 Jan; 37(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 1941690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gynaecologic ultrasound.
    Levine D
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Jan; 53(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 9464428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adnexal masses: comparison of specificity of endovaginal US and pelvic MR imaging.
    Jain KA; Friedman DL; Pettinger TW; Alagappan R; Jeffrey RB; Sommer FG
    Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):697-704. PubMed ID: 8430177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnostic imaging of menometrorrhagia].
    Bazot M; Robert Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Dec; 37 Suppl 8():S334-42. PubMed ID: 19268211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.