These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2077921)

  • 1. [Evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar after cesarean section by echography].
    Titchenko LI; Belousov MA; Zhilenko MI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1990 Nov; (11):69-70. PubMed ID: 2077921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Silent dehiscence of a caesarean section scar with placenta praevia accreta.
    Maria NE; Mishra N; Mubarek M; Reginald PW
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jan; 23(1):77. PubMed ID: 12647706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound.
    Klemm P; Koehler C; Mangler M; Schneider U; Schneider A
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 16207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Zimmer M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():365. PubMed ID: 25733122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.
    Wang CB; Chiu WW; Lee CY; Sun YL; Lin YH; Tseng CJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 19565535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.
    Ofili-Yebovi D; Ben-Nagi J; Sawyer E; Yazbek J; Lee C; Gonzalez J; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 31(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 18061960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sonographic Findings and Diagnostic Pitfalls in Evaluation for Uterine Rupture in a Case of Fetal Demise and Prior Cesarean Delivery of Unknown Type.
    Spain JA; Shaikh S; Sandberg SA
    Ultrasound Q; 2017 Mar; 33(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 28081020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dehiscent scar in the lower uterine segment after Caesarean section and IVF infertility treatment: a case report.
    Filipcikova R; Oborna I; Brezinova J; Bezdickova M; Laichman S; Dobias M; Blazkova Z; Hladikova B; Pastucha D
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2014 Dec; 158(4):654-8. PubMed ID: 23446209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect.
    Roberge S; Boutin A; Chaillet N; Moore L; Jastrow N; Demers S; Bujold E
    Am J Perinatol; 2012 Jun; 29(6):465-71. PubMed ID: 22399223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An arterio-venous malformation related to a uterine scar defect, an unusual association.
    Lebreton C; Deffieux X; Vieillefosse S; Maitre S; Vivanti AJ
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 49(6):101733. PubMed ID: 32234561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
    Ceci O; Scioscia M; Bettocchi S; Cantatore C; Nardelli C; Laera A; Vimercati A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 1):452; author reply 452. PubMed ID: 18238987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section.
    Donnez O; Jadoul P; Squifflet J; Donnez J
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):974-80. PubMed ID: 17624346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When a cesarean section scar is more than an innocent bystander in a subsequent pregnancy: Ultrasound to the rescue.
    Singh D; Kaur L
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jul; 45(6):319-327. PubMed ID: 28440856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound appearance of uterine wall prior to dehiscence.
    Norris E; Crosfill F
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 May; 33(4):418-9. PubMed ID: 23654333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility of prediction of cesarean section scar dehiscence in the third trimester by three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Mansour GM; El-Mekkawi SF; Khairy HT; Mossad AE
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 May; 28(8):944-8. PubMed ID: 24962499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of echography for assessing the state of the cicatrix on the uterus after corporeal cesarean section].
    Demidov VN
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1979 Mar; (3):26-7. PubMed ID: 434362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography.
    Regnard C; Nosbusch M; Fellemans C; Benali N; van Rysselberghe M; Barlow P; Rozenberg S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 23(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 15027020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uterine scar dehiscence--a demanding defect.
    Rigney T; Flood K; Eogan M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():138. PubMed ID: 25791386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonographic appearance of uterine scar dehiscence.
    Bromley B; Pitcher BL; Klapholz H; Lichter E; Benacerraf BR
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1995 Oct; 51(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8582519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.