133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2078068)
1. [New protocol for local staging in bladder carcinoma. Ultrasonographic, cytological and histopathological correlation].
Rodríguez Luna JM; Mayayo Dehesa T; Burgos Revilla J; Escudero Barrilero A
Arch Esp Urol; 1990; 43 Suppl 1():51-64. PubMed ID: 2078068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Staging of bladder carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography and transurethral echography].
Nakanishi A; Takada M; Tsujihashi H; Kohri K; Kurita T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1989 Sep; 35(9):1483-7. PubMed ID: 2683659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Radiologic evaluation of parietal infiltration of bladder cancer (integrated imaging: US, TC, RM) and comparison with transurethral resection (TUR)].
Gauldi GF; Ceroni AM; Burrai L; Capuano R; Polettini E
Clin Ter; 1995 Nov; 146(11):691-711. PubMed ID: 8720346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical application of MRI for urological malignancy. 2: Usefulness of various imaging modalities for local staging of bladder cancer; a comparison between MRI, CT and transurethral ultrasonography].
Nishimura K; Horii Y; Matsuda T; Okada Y; Takeuchi H; Yoshida O; Nishimura K; Nakano Y; Kaku S; Nishibuchi S
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Dec; 34(12):2091-6. PubMed ID: 3071122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of bladder cancer: comparison with computed tomography (CT) and transurethral ultrasonography (US).
Nishimura K; Hida S; Nishio Y; Ohishi K; Okada Y; Okada K; Yoshida O; Nishimura K; Nishibuchi S
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1988 Sep; 18(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 3045372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of novel endoluminal ultrasonography and conventional transurethral ultrasonography in staging of bladder cancer.
Saga Y; Numata A; Tokumitsu M; Yamaguchi S; Fujii H; Hashimoto H; Kaneko S; Yachiku S
Int J Urol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 15285748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Staging of urinary bladder tumors with CT and MRI].
Akmangit I; Lakadamyali H; Oto A; Ozen H; Akhan O; Besim A
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Mar; 9(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 14661295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation between superficial and muscle-invasive tumor of the bladder: a comparative study with computerized tomography and transurethral ultrasonography.
Tachibana M; Baba S; Deguchi N; Jitsukawa S; Hata M; Tazaki H; Tanimoto A; Yuasa Y; Hiramatsu K
J Urol; 1991 Jun; 145(6):1169-73. PubMed ID: 2033686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT in determining the depth of infiltration of bladder tumors.
Salo JO; Kivisaari L; Lehtonen T
Urol Radiol; 1985; 7(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 4012932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic MRI of bladder cancer: evaluation of staging accuracy.
Tekes A; Kamel I; Imam K; Szarf G; Schoenberg M; Nasir K; Thompson R; Bluemke D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 15615961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Possibilities and limitations of computed tomographic staging of bladder carcinoma].
Lorenz R; Beyer D; Allhoff E; Mödder U
Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):660-5. PubMed ID: 6429779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary staging of urinary bladder carcinoma: the role of MRI and a comparison with CT.
Barentsz JO; Jager GJ; Witjes JA; Ruijs JH
Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8797968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Value of imaging procedures in the diagnosis and staging of bladder tumors].
Nicolas V; Harder T; Steudel A; Krahe T; Schindler G; van Ahlen H; Jaeger N
Rofo; 1988 Mar; 148(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 2832883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Staging with computed tomography, transrectal ultrasonography and transurethral resection of bladder tumour: comparison with final pathological stage in invasive bladder carcinoma.
Yaman O; Baltaci S; Arikan N; Yilmaz E; Gögüs O
Br J Urol; 1996 Aug; 78(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 8813912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with computed tomography and intravesical ultrasound in staging bladder cancer.
Salo JO; Kivisaari L; Lehtonen T
Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 3072748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transurethral ultrasonography, CT scan, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging and pathological control in staging and follow up of invasive bladder carcinoma.
Pavone C; Di Trapani D; Serretta V; Filosto L; Cacciatore M; Caramia G; Pavone-Macaluso M
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1988; 260():251-63. PubMed ID: 3283763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Comparison of ultrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, digital angiography, and computerized tomography with lipiodol].
Bartolozzi C; Lencioni R; Caramella D; Gibilisco G; Cioni R; Vignali C
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 7997616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging bladder carcinoma by three-dimensional ultrasound rendering.
Wagner B; Nesslauer T; Bartsch G; Hautmann RE; Gottfried HW
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 15749550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in staging of superficial bladder cancer.
Scattoni V; Da Pozzo LF; Colombo R; Nava L; Rigatti P; De Cobelli F; Vanzulli A; Del Maschio A
J Urol; 1996 May; 155(5):1594-9. PubMed ID: 8627831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Intravesical echography. II. Staging].
Passas J; Espuela R; Leiva O; Calahorra J; de la Rosa F; Borobia V
Arch Esp Urol; 1990; 43 Suppl 1():35-47. PubMed ID: 2078067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
