These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2078152)
1. Quality hospitals: the legal privilege legislation & implications for clinicians. George PT Aust Clin Rev; 1990; 10(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 2078152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data. Stevens M Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 10126149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protecting hospitals from judicial narrowing of state peer review statutes. Lending RM Healthspan; 1990 Oct; 7(9):8-11. PubMed ID: 10107402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical malpractice litigation: the discoverability and use of hospitals' quality assurance committee records. Holbrook RF; Dunn LJ Med Malpract Cost Containment J; 1979 Jul; 1(2):109-31. PubMed ID: 10243995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal access to patient health records/protection of quality assurance activities. Feehan KP Health Law Can; 1991; 12(1):3-10, 31. PubMed ID: 10114435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What legal protection should a hospital provide, if any, to its ethics committee and individual members? Staubach SM HEC Forum; 1989; 1(4):209-20. PubMed ID: 10296920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The case for legislation to provide legal privilege for quality assurance in NSW in 1988. Stuart D Aust Clin Rev; 1988 Sep; 8(30):153-6. PubMed ID: 3228395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital ethics committees required by law in Maryland. Hollinger PC Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 2714965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. George JE; Rouse AR N J Med; 1987 Jun; 84(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 3475597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential liability for institutional review boards and bioethics committees. Reider A Home Care Econ; 1987; 1(4):119-21. PubMed ID: 10285379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the risk of legal liability for ethics committees. Merritt AL Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 3350642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital peer review committees: privileges of confidentiality and immunity. Butler RE South Tex Law J; 1982; 23(1):45-69. PubMed ID: 11649551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A conversation on medical injury. Leape LL; Swankin DS; Yessian MR Public Health Rep; 1999; 114(4):302-17. PubMed ID: 10501129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Malpractice by committee. Can Doct; 1987 May; 53(5):GP22. PubMed ID: 10282055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach. Mills DH Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cloak and Dagger? Statutory Privilege for Quality Activities in New Zealand. Duggal M J Law Med; 2016; 24(1):252-66. PubMed ID: 30136786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nursing plays integral role on ethics committees. Costa L Contemp Longterm Care; 1991 Apr; 14(4):54. PubMed ID: 10110227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Bill. Frizelle F N Z Med J; 2002 Nov; 115(1166):U254. PubMed ID: 12552273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]