These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20797342)

  • 21. Developmental consequences of embryo and cell manipulation in mice and farm animals.
    McEvoy TG; Robinson JJ; Sinclair KD
    Reproduction; 2001 Oct; 122(4):507-18. PubMed ID: 11570957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States.
    Kovalevsky G; Patrizio P
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 16084872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of gamete source and culture conditions on the competence of in vitro-produced embryos for post-transfer survival in cattle.
    Hansen PJ; Block J; Loureiro B; Bonilla L; Hendricks KE
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2010; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 20003846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cloned transgenic swine via in vitro production and cryopreservation.
    Li R; Lai L; Wax D; Hao Y; Murphy CN; Rieke A; Samuel M; Linville ML; Korte SW; Evans RW; Turk JR; Kang JX; Witt WT; Dai Y; Prather RS
    Biol Reprod; 2006 Aug; 75(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 16672718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Thyroid hormone supplementation improves bovine embryo development in vitro.
    Ashkar FA; Semple E; Schmidt CH; St John E; Bartlewski PM; King WA
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Feb; 25(2):334-44. PubMed ID: 19920067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intrauterine transfer of early canine embryos.
    Tsutsui T; Hori T; Endo S; Hayama A; Kawakami E
    Theriogenology; 2006 Oct; 66(6-7):1703-5. PubMed ID: 16497366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nuclear transfer in cats and its application.
    Gómez MC; Pope CE; Dresser BL
    Theriogenology; 2006 Jul; 66(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 16620927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Somatic cell nuclear transfer in horses: effect of oocyte morphology, embryo reconstruction method and donor cell type.
    Lagutina I; Lazzari G; Duchi R; Colleoni S; Ponderato N; Turini P; Crotti G; Galli C
    Reproduction; 2005 Oct; 130(4):559-67. PubMed ID: 16183874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Toward culture of single gametes: the development of microfluidic platforms for assisted reproduction.
    Wheeler MB; Walters EM; Beebe DJ
    Theriogenology; 2007 Sep; 68 Suppl 1():S178-89. PubMed ID: 17524470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dogs cloned from adult somatic cells.
    Lee BC; Kim MK; Jang G; Oh HJ; Yuda F; Kim HJ; Hossein MS; Kim JJ; Kang SK; Schatten G; Hwang WS
    Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7051):641. PubMed ID: 16079832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The risk of small ruminant lentivirus (SRLV) transmission with reproductive biotechnologies: state-of-the-art review.
    Cortez-Romero C; Pellerin JL; Ali-Al-Ahmad MZ; Chebloune Y; Gallegos-Sánchez J; Lamara A; Pépin M; Fieni F
    Theriogenology; 2013 Jan; 79(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23131465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Advanced reproductive technology in the water buffalo.
    Drost M
    Theriogenology; 2007 Aug; 68(3):450-3. PubMed ID: 17481722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Aggregating embryonic but not somatic nuclear transfer embryos increases cloning efficiency in cattle.
    Misica-Turner PM; Oback FC; Eichenlaub M; Wells DN; Oback B
    Biol Reprod; 2007 Feb; 76(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 17050861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of retained embryos on the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies.
    Lee HC; Seifer DB; Shelden RM
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Aug; 82(2):334-7. PubMed ID: 15302280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An update on reproductive technologies with potential short-term application in pig production.
    Martinez EA; Vazquez JM; Roca J; Cuello C; Gil MA; Parrilla I; Vazquez JL
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2005 Aug; 40(4):300-9. PubMed ID: 16008760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Canine embryonic and fetal development: a review.
    Pretzer SD
    Theriogenology; 2008 Aug; 70(3):300-3. PubMed ID: 18513790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chromosome variation in the embryos of domestic animals.
    King WA
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 120(1-2):81-90. PubMed ID: 18467828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Developmental disparity between in vitro-produced and somatic cell nuclear transfer bovine days 14 and 21 embryos: implications for embryonic loss.
    Alexopoulos NI; Maddox-Hyttel P; Tveden-Nyborg P; D'Cruz NT; Tecirlioglu TR; Cooney MA; Schauser K; Holland MK; French AJ
    Reproduction; 2008 Oct; 136(4):433-45. PubMed ID: 18606825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The analysis of chromatin remodeling and the staining for DNA methylation and histone acetylation do not provide definitive indicators of the developmental ability of inter-species cloned embryos.
    Lee E; Kim JH; Park SM; Jeong YI; Lee JY; Park SW; Choi J; Kim HS; Jeong YW; Kim S; Hyun SH; Hwang WS
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2008 May; 105(3-4):438-50. PubMed ID: 18276088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Irreversible barrier to the reprogramming of donor cells in cloning with mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells.
    Ono Y; Kono T
    Biol Reprod; 2006 Aug; 75(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 16687651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.